Supplied equipment feet or cones ,etc?

While it may be the manufacturer's intent to match the cone size to the weight of the component,of all the DH cones,the Jumbo are the least detrimental to pace and flow.My experience with the Jumbo in lightweight applications has been very positive and we regularly use them beneath several components of well under 10 pounds total weight to good effect.
IMO,the flagship Super is a PRaT disaster regardless of its impressive sonic properties and I have yet to find an application beneath any electronics where they were preferred.
I find the DH Large to also be good devices at quite reasonable expense tho they have more traditional cone-type filtering properties and more limited range.

Apologies for my mistake. I meant to say "Large" and NOT the "Super" for front end applications. I failed to check Golden Sound's naming conventions at their site before posting (the boxes don't have names printed on them).
There are significant differences in frequency balance between the large and jumbo, and I strongly suggest you try both before deciding.

THANKS FOR ALL OF YOUR RESPONSES,I'LL PONDER THE NEW CHOICES PRESENTED.SEEMS LIKE IT'S YET ANOTHER CAREFUL DECISION TO MAKE IN THIS COMPLEX HOBBY OF OURS...

THANKS FOR ALL OF YOUR RESPONSES,I'LL PONDER THE NEW CHOICES PRESENTED.SEEMS LIKE IT'S YET ANOTHER CAREFUL DECISION TO MAKE IN THIS COMPLEX HOBBY OF OURS...