What's better: RCA or XLR?


What is better; RCA or XLR connectors and why? With some brands of cables, the RCA plug cost more than the XLR, Why?
My System: Classe CA300 amp
Classe cp50 Pre-amp
Classe cdp .5 cd player
BW Nautilus 804 speakers
joeb
joeb
Very good clarification by bear regarding the XLR vs RCA connector. I would further clarify that XLR I/Os could be installed on the chassis of any component that was unbalanced in nature, and simply bridge the pin configurations for true unbalanced operation. That being said, I feel that the RCA connector was a very poor design that quickly deteriorates after repeated use. The lack of any locking mechanisms, to insure stability and reliability, seem rather amatuerish as an industry standard to me. Its no wonder the original Mark Levinson gear insisted on Fischer/Camac type connectors. He saw the problem and adressed it.It was unrealistic, since all other equipment lacked these, so interface was always through more RCAs. It was like having a 24 bit machine with only 16 bit discs to play through it.............Frank
While it is usually best to have a fully balanced system I did get rid of a hum problem that I had with my amp by putting XLR's on the amp end of my interconnects and leaving RCA's on the preamp end. I eventually added XLR outputs to my preamp. Even though it is not a balanced design, I like the better connection that the XLR's make.
I had similar set-up about 6 months ago definitely go with the XLR it is more quiet background and dynamic.
I have found the shorter and less complicated the signal path the better.Single ended have a less complicated path than balanced.Single ended I sense to be more coherent.