What Harmonic tech cables should I used for CD


Is the magic digital one the best option or should I go for
Magic link IC? I dont used separates just an AVR receiver and a DVD player for all applications. I know that for DVD-audio the best way to go is RCA IC for the pre-outs. But for CD dont know if RCA analog cable is a good option or if I should go with digital transfer like the Magic Digital One. Is Magic digital one a good cable for home thater aplications too(dts Dolby Digital)? I now have pro-9 speaker cable to conect a Vienna acoustics Mozarts speakers from Denon gear. If someone Knows this products can help? Thanks.
victorhsalcedo
I had hoped the Truthlinks would have done better as well especially condidering what I paid for them. The largest difference is that the high frequency and upper mids are smeared and grainy on the Truthlinks in comparison to the Crosslinks. I use the .5m Crosslinks presently between my Cablebox and AV receiver. The Truthlinks are between my AV receiver L-R outs to my preamp surround pass through. I run Virtual Dynamics Audition IC's between the CDP and Pre and Amp. The Audition cables blow the Truthlinks out of the water. They are more balanced top to bottom and much quieter. Having said all this I am on the lookout for a 3m pair of balanced silver IC's for between the pre and the amp at some point. Apparently the Silways are out in a MK III version now and are supposed to have cleared up some of the glare. I have tested the Truthlinks in two different systems between the Cardas Crosslink and the Virtual Dynamics Audition IC's. My friend and I both rated the HT's as the worst of the three with the Crosslinks better, and the Auditions much better still. Some of this may be system dependent but as I said his is using quite a bit differnt gear from mine and the results were Identical between both. YMMV. I am glad that the Truthlinks are doing good for you in your system but would suggest that perhaps you explore some other manufacturer's cables if only for comparison's sake.
I found the Pro-Silway II to equal the Nordost Red Dawn in many ways on my CDP (Electrocompaniet)...both being a bit lean. Nordost SPM bettered both. ALL were just a bit too revealing for my leanish MD100 tuner, where the Truthlink works superbly, providing an outstanding balance for this great tuner....
I suspect that Cosmic's experience of "graininess" with the HT is actually evidence of their resolving power, whereas the VD is actually smothering this digital unwanted detail with its typical top octave squashing. One man's improvement is another's flaw. It's all about system balance and digititis with CDPs. With a cleaner CDP you might prefer the more transparent HT; with a dirtier digital front end the VD's treble-cut quality can be a bandaid-blessing. Tweeter/room treatment all figure in this too.
I won't say the truthlinks are "doing good" in my system since i haven't tried a lot of cables, i just know they are reasonably good in most areas and don't really know any better. The truthlinks stood up well to some Transparent Supers (though the mids with the supers were outstandin, too bad the top and bottm failed) that the dealer was trying to sell me for about 10 times per foot higher cost than i paid for the HTs so i bought them and quit looking. i should maybe look into something better but man i dread having to sort through all thats out there
I agree with Subaruguru that the VD's are probably shelving the top octave or so. They are pretty revealing other than that. I am unhappy with the top end I'm getting from them. However, on my buddy's system they didn't shelve the top octave at all it seems. He has the Arcam FMJ23t CDP which is more revealing than my MF A3 CD. It has been said that the MF also rolls off the top end itself. Still what I am saying is that the particular 1.5m Truthlink cable sounded grainy to both me and my friend on both our systems. The fact that my VD's sounded better on his system than mine just goes to show how these things are system dependent. I am interested in running about a 3 or 4m set of quality silver IC's balanced between my pre and my amp in the future in an effort to regain this lost octave and keep some of the other detail and niceness the VD's do bring to the mix. I am not saying the HT's were bad, just how they sounded in the two systems I'm familiar with in comparison to a couple of other cables I'm familiar with. Use this info at you own discretion. On the whole I prefer a clean and very open high end verging on being bright. If that is what the HT's were doing then I would have certainly prefered them over the VD's. The HT's simply sounded smeared in comparison.
If you want a cable verging on bright the pro silways may be the ticket for you. They are a combination of copper for the mids and low and silvers for the top end air and sparkle. There was a lot to like about them between tha amp and pre, except for the price for a 20 ft pair. and i still use them on the analog componants (tuner and TT) with your cdp they may not have the glare problem they had with mine. One word of warning, you will not regain a lost octave by using a cable between your amp and pre when the information in that octave was lost on it's travels between the source and pre...you need to fix that problem where it starts.