Sony SCD-1 balanced or unbalanced?

My SCD-1 is used with RCA's. It is noise free running straight to a standard wall outlet. I could not detect any change using balanced connectors, which I A/B tested on a Classe DR5 pre-amp. Regarding tube products, the SCD-1 is connected to a Hovland HP-100 preamp. The amplifier is a Mac MC2000 (both tube products that have a grain free sound with great resolution & dynamics). The speakers I've used on this combo are watt/puppy 6.0's and ML Prodigy's. Both sound terrific and have their own separate strengths. I just recently changed to a Pro Silway MKII between the SCD-1 & the Hovland. This is a great combo beating Cardas Neutral References and numerous other Audioquest & Alpha Core cables. I tried a Pro Silway between the Hovland & Mac with zero sucess. The sound was extremely flat. I am waiting on a Alpha Core TQ to test in place of the Pro Silway on the SCD-1 and to test between the amp & preamp. I have found silver interconnects, or combo silver/copper IC's to work best. The Pro Silways are quite remarkable between the SCD-1 & preamp. Great dynamics & resolution with no grain. Of course, poor recordings cannot be overcome by any component or cable.

Jadem6, you are correct, in your case. No doubt if you're using expensive (and very good sounding, I might add) cables, you are also paying attention to clean power, keeping interconnects away from power cords, etc. You will not hear any differnce between RCA and balanced -- unless you go past 2 meters, in which case balanced will begin to preform better for a variety of reasons. Also balanced MAY be less subject to power problems as Bluefin has noted. To that, I might add that ther may be a synergy between certain types of cables and components and the balanced/unbalanced question will become part of that complex, black art equation. In your case, RCA sounded jsut the same, so it is! Others, with different preamp/amp combos may find exactly the opposite, so I'm sure this debate will never go away. In my case, RCAs from my SCD-1 to my Placette line stage EASILY outperformed a fully balanced set of NBS cables into a Classe PD-60. But it wasn't the cables, it was the preamp that made the differnce -- the Placette was clearly superior -- the cables made the A/B easy because they just got out of the way -- and it didn't matter whether they were balanced or not. However my runs were short (1 meter) so your mileage may differ. --Lorne

I am using singled-ended with my SCD-1. To me I really do
not see why I need to use XLR connections because my SCD-1
and pre-amp are on the same rack. XLR is designed for very
long cable runs, e.g., from microphone to recording console.
For usual high-end equipments I do not see the point of using XLR or fully balanced circuitry. (If your pre-amp is three blocks away, then you should definitely use XLR.)
On the other hand I am using the Transcendent Grounded Grid
pre-amp with SCD-1 and I am very happy about it. I would suggest you give GG a try, and you can even build it yourself for $500! Several months ago when I was looking for a tube pre-amp to match my system, I was thinking about
Audible Illusion Mod 3A, and ARC LS-25, but finally I choosed GG by the very obvious reason: $$. My current system consists of:
Front end: Sony SCD-1
Pre-Amp: Transcendent Sound Grounded Grid
Power Amp: McIntosh MC-275 Gordon Gow
Speakers: Quad 989

I found that with my SCD-1 that running balanced, the unit was very inferior and sounded much better when run with single ended cables.

It seems the SCD-1 doesn't have a true balanced output, instead it is converted from the unbalanced one by some additional circuitry. At least this is what was discussed in AudioAsylum....