Why does my computer sound better than my CD player?

I was a contributor to a thread about the AR cables, possibly the one that Sugarbrie referred to. I found them to be flat and dull sounding in my system but the owner of these cables found them to be VERY bright in his system. Since you are also changing interconnects when switching sources, this may be part of "brightness" problem.

As to your selection of Kimber 4PR, it is VERY well known that this is a bright and "zippy / zingy" sounding cable. Even Stereophile states this in their "recommended components" description. Transients are highlighted and spectral decay is minimized. As such, music tends to sound VERY fast and articulate upon the striking or playing of notes but lacks body and harmonic overtones. As such, it can work well in a system that is overtly warm and bloated but i would think that it would not be complimentary to speakers using metal domes. Sean
>

I found the Cambridge Audio CD player bright and harsh when I auditioned it. As others have suggested, see if you can try yet another CD player.

- Eric

I was not suggesting the Cambridge is bright. It is right out of the box new (but so is every CD player), but after 100 hours it is fine. There are reviews on the Cambridge in Stereophile, HiFi Choice, and Audio & Video Lifestyle. None of them found it bright. They all recommend it. I can't think of another under $500 machine worth considering. The power cord comment comes for the fact that the bass is a little bloated IMHO with the cheap AC cord they give you.

While i don't know about the 500, i know that Listener magazine REALLY liked one of their earlier models. They basically said that it was "THEE" budget cd player to beat. Sean