Digital "Crispies" and the ART di/o

I've heard this in ART DI/O units, but haven't been able to pin it down and haven't had the chance to ask around as you are. I would notice it only on specific tracks, and it appears to be towards higher frequencies when it shows up.

My question to you, do you notice it more or less at different ART settings? (ex. X2, vs internal lock, vs external lock)

Secondly -- When you're looking at the front lights, does your lock light go on and off through a track alot? Do you find that your red light, the one I believe is actually for A/D, goes red a lot?

I know there is a DIOMODS group on Yahoo that I've yet to look into, you might want to inquire there -- plenty of folks that know the product in and out.

I think this was asked already, but is your unit modified at all?

If you do get an answer outside of these boards, please drop an email!

A 1981 digital recording is an early digital recording...that may be the problem. The DIO may be passing along more info, which may include more low level info, but it may also include flaws in the recording or engineering. It's hard to say without hearing the sound.

I have a stock, unmodified DI/O with the upgraded Stancor power supply. I am using aftermarket line attenuators to reduce its output to 2 volts so I have been able to use my MIT and Harmonic Tech interconnects with it.
I have found that it emits RFI and the static/grainy sound that you mention does show up on certain recordings with certain digital cables. I listen primarily in "X2" mode and have not been able get the "external sync" mode to work with any transport (3) that I have been able to try.
I have found that if you leave the tube installed and use either an Apogee or Canare digital cable that the problem seems to go away. Your mileage may vary here. I am well aware that the tube is supposed to have nothing to do with the D/A conversion but my DI/O sounds slightly better with the tube installed as opposed to removed. I have also installed 75ohm shorting plugs on the analogue inputs and digital output, which has helped a little with the RFI (but it still emits some).
As for its sonic performance (stock), it is worth every nickel of its street price, but alas, I am afraid it is not a giant killer. I do prefer it to the MSB and Audio Alchemy dacs that I have heard in that the DI/O is a little smoother and has decent bass response for a budget piece. It is a lot of fun to play around with. I have been experimenting with the a/d/d/a converison at various tube warmth settings. However for serious listening, my 1996 Micromega DUO BS2 will beat it in almost every sonic parameter. My stock DI/O is a bit rough sounding in the upper midrange and it does not image very well. Some violins sound a bit "steely" and some voices do not sound as natural compared to the Micromega. If the modifications that are being offered address these weaknesses, then this could be a tremendous bargain.