Mwilson... I never said there was no difference. Contrare. My argument is that the 'difference' will not lead to realsim, or 'live' like playback. That it is only useful in achieving some subjective sonic quality or other in the system.
To what end though? To mask the reality that is recorded on the source material? Why? Why not rahter be selective in obtaining well produced, and engineered recordings that are 'true to the original' on purpose. Then enjoy the music as 'live' like as possible, and hear what the musicians intended.
If you mask the realities of the source material you will achieve a sameness of what is played back, but never realism.
Better to use reference earphones to listen to the source, then compare to what you hear through your system in the room. It can be discouraging, but like Dr Phil says, 'you cannot change what you not acknowledge'.
BTW the notion of 'relativism' is an offense to the notion of 'truth'. But take your pick. To each his own, I guess.
That is my position, and I am sticking to it.
To what end though? To mask the reality that is recorded on the source material? Why? Why not rahter be selective in obtaining well produced, and engineered recordings that are 'true to the original' on purpose. Then enjoy the music as 'live' like as possible, and hear what the musicians intended.
If you mask the realities of the source material you will achieve a sameness of what is played back, but never realism.
Better to use reference earphones to listen to the source, then compare to what you hear through your system in the room. It can be discouraging, but like Dr Phil says, 'you cannot change what you not acknowledge'.
BTW the notion of 'relativism' is an offense to the notion of 'truth'. But take your pick. To each his own, I guess.
That is my position, and I am sticking to it.