Mraybeck - Thanks for the info on your experience. I am trying to be careful about which route to go. I appreciate the info. I had been wondering what role the Denon plays with any signal that comes into it-digital or analog.
Obviously to do the DSP junk (which I do not use) it has to be grabbing the signal and processing it. For Home Theatre one wants it to handle the signal in 5.1, but for stereo I would just as soon it left it alone and let the D/A from the Pioneer DVD/CD handle the duties.
Getting the Parasound to bypass the Denon power amp for the fronts made a major difference.
I think I understand what you are saying about the input signal from a DAC being then "reprocessed" through the Denon surround circuitry.Probably defeats the purpose.
What about this from the Denon manual: ????????
Playback using the external input (EXT. IN) jacks
"Set the external input (EXT IN) mode"
Once this is selected, the input signals connected to the FR,FL,C,SL, and SR channels of the EXT IN jacks are output directly to the fronts,center,and surround speaker systems without passing through the surround circuitry"
Is this what you mean by an analog bypass circuit?
As far as the toslink, I was using a cheap plastic toslink.
I didn't know any better. I then did some reading here on Audiogon and just got the SOUND Professionals Glass Toslink.
Major difference is sound clarity, depth, space, and actual volume of the signal. I do, however, want to try a decent coax and compare. Most people smarter than me seem to prefer a coax to a toslink.
Let me know if this EXT In thing has any merit. I never really noticed it, or thought about it until lately. Supposedly this Denon can use a totally different processor if one wants to do so.
I have thought about a separate preamp, but where do the speaker wires go for the fronts. They are presently connected to the Parasound. I am a little fuzzy on this point. This si the discussion that my forend and I got started on that led to him stating to try a DAC rather than try and configure a preamp with my existing system. He maybe assumed that I has analog bypass (which I might if the EXT IN thing works as I read it).
Thanks.
Obviously to do the DSP junk (which I do not use) it has to be grabbing the signal and processing it. For Home Theatre one wants it to handle the signal in 5.1, but for stereo I would just as soon it left it alone and let the D/A from the Pioneer DVD/CD handle the duties.
Getting the Parasound to bypass the Denon power amp for the fronts made a major difference.
I think I understand what you are saying about the input signal from a DAC being then "reprocessed" through the Denon surround circuitry.Probably defeats the purpose.
What about this from the Denon manual: ????????
Playback using the external input (EXT. IN) jacks
"Set the external input (EXT IN) mode"
Once this is selected, the input signals connected to the FR,FL,C,SL, and SR channels of the EXT IN jacks are output directly to the fronts,center,and surround speaker systems without passing through the surround circuitry"
Is this what you mean by an analog bypass circuit?
As far as the toslink, I was using a cheap plastic toslink.
I didn't know any better. I then did some reading here on Audiogon and just got the SOUND Professionals Glass Toslink.
Major difference is sound clarity, depth, space, and actual volume of the signal. I do, however, want to try a decent coax and compare. Most people smarter than me seem to prefer a coax to a toslink.
Let me know if this EXT In thing has any merit. I never really noticed it, or thought about it until lately. Supposedly this Denon can use a totally different processor if one wants to do so.
I have thought about a separate preamp, but where do the speaker wires go for the fronts. They are presently connected to the Parasound. I am a little fuzzy on this point. This si the discussion that my forend and I got started on that led to him stating to try a DAC rather than try and configure a preamp with my existing system. He maybe assumed that I has analog bypass (which I might if the EXT IN thing works as I read it).
Thanks.