2. digital
  3. 1040327866

Here's how a CD copy of a copy can sound better

Just wanting to check my logic here. People keep saying how burning CD copies at 1x speed allow them to sound better (than 32x speed, say) when being played back through Audiophile systems. I have burned copies of several CD's at 8x, and do not have the original. I should be able to take these copies and make re-copies at 1x speed, and these 1x copy-of-a-copy copies should sound better than their counterparts, right?

There is no data lost when a CD is copied, only placed on the disc differently. This is evidenced by the fact that you can copy a CD-ROM, which is a bit-perfect copy.
matt8268
alpha9
4 posts
 
I burned my cd by using computer cd re-writer @ 3x. The copy sounded about 85-90% of the original. I play them on the Sony XA7ES for comparation (with the high end system ,i.e cables,amp ,preamp and speakers). I think we have to use very good equipments to hear a difference.
ake
48 posts
 
"If done correctly digital copies can sound better than the original. If done incorrectly digiatl copies can sound worse than the original."

Could someone elaborate this statement? Frankly I still don't understand how one can get a copied CD that sounds better than the original.

Ake
matt8268 OP
92 posts
 
Great discussion! Please can someone respond to my original question though, which is if I have some copies I made at high speed (for which I no longer have the original), will I get better sound if I copy these 8x copies again to a 1x copy?
sogood51
2,157 posts
 
No you will not get better sound than what is already on the cdrs you have.
mrowlands
54 posts
 
Matt8268, if you get a low jitter bitstream identical to the original CD, in theory you could achieve a better sound quality by re-recording at X1 speed for the reasons mentioned above. Do you have a way to do a bit-compare on audio CDs? Just try it and let us know. Be advised that small differences in jitter may only be audible on higher-fidelity systems.
More to discover