Absolute top tier DAC for standard res Redbook CD

Contact me and I will build you a DHT DAC that will blow all these away.

When I started building a DAC with DHT output based on Esoteric P-03/D-03 combo was 10 years ago, but not many could afford it. :-)

In my experience, to build a "proper" DHT output stage of a DAC, it has to be separated on two enclosures, one of which is the bulky power supply. Want one? :-)

But what is the purpose of a DAC with DHT output stage connected to an amplifier with DHT output stage? :-)

Best,
Alex Peychev
APL Hi-Fi

Steve N, I like texas instruments-Burr-Brown dac chips myself, listened to many others, always owned The burr-Browns, maybe not to the level you guys are talking about with dac chips, anyway, an oldie but goodie is the 1796 BB, incredible life like treble to say the least, very real sounding, not steril, analitical, cold, good to my ears, I preferred the 1796 over the 1704 that the masses like, cheers

Melbguy1, welcome to this great thread, are you going for the vitus player?

Steve,

I am not throwing out anything else but the truth, and thanks for confirming it.

You can select the digital filter on my DAC and I recommend the profile for 192 to be used for all sample-rates. This simply sounds best.

Usually the digital filter in a delta-sigma converter is set at 2x for 192k, 4x for 96k and 8x for 48k sample rates, resulting in a constant out-of-band noise figure allowing you to use the same analog filter at the output. So you are still using 2x oversampling with 192 mode selected. The D/S modulator speed is fixed and there is nothing you can do about it. Some latest DAC chips support 384k with the digital filter totally bypassed, but this is not the case for the AN DAC device you are using. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Yes, I have read your posts that you don't like the sound of AKM DACs, but try to convince the owners of Esoteric K-01, for example, that their player doesn't sound good because it has AKM inside.

As I said, it is all about preferences (synergy to be exact) and the resulting sound quality, nothing else. This said, there is no universal recipe for anything, including audio.

Best wishes,
Alex Peychev
APL Hi-Fi

Hi Matt, I want you to know, since you are computer audio, The Romulas signature has the prized X-mos chip inside that the two designers here are raving about, Then you have the harmonix technology resonance footers stock on the player to get the player to perform to best results, there is alot more I can specify about this product, however, I believe you should go to the Aeshetix site and research, in turn, only if you get the Romulas or pandora signature will you be able to out perform the current dacs here, and God forbid you get a signature with the state of the art volume control to run direct to amps that does not come stock, it is an implentation that cost more money for many good reasons, cheers