Stereophile Rated the Sqeezebox Touch Class D

Here we go again with a bad case of audiophile anxiety.

Stereophile releases their ratings and some poor audiophool gets all wound up because they didn't bless what he bought and likes. I too used to be that way. My component dropped into class B or off the list and I would stew about it until I had to upgrade. That was until I figured out if sounded good to me I couldn't care less what Stereophile thinks. There's nothing in my system that I know of on any of their lists and I couldn't be happier.

If it upsets you when your stuff isn't highly ranked then quit reading the lists.

.

.

Their rankings aren't A-F like a report card. D doesn't mean it's a "bad" rating. ANYTHING on their recommended list is going to be a good piece of equipment.

Nobody is going to pay any attention to that rating, because they'll be too distracted by the Vincent ad on the adjacent page :-)

Best regards,
-- Al

The rating does seems inconsistent with the review in the same issue. There's much praise for the sound when connected via the digital out. The sound from the analog outs is criticized as a step or two down by comparison, but comparable to the analog out sound of the Oppo 83. But the Oppo is graded a class B product. It doesn't make sense.

Mlsstl, I somewhat agree with you.

Herman, you are missing the point. Look at my posted system. With all the $$$ I have spent on it and then along comes this $299 Sqeezebox Touch that can do everything my expensive CD Player can and it gets tossed into a class D rating. I believe that is just wrong. I personally think it is because of its low cost.

Synthfreek , the ratings mean something or a rating scale would not be used.

Almarg, I noticed her, very nice. She seems to have a frown on her face though. Probably the sqeezebox rating.

Onhwy61 , Yes your right.

Below is my comments on a posting on another site and below that is John Atkinson (Stereophile) reply.
___________________________________________________________ My comments

The Touch is made to be also used as a digital transport.
The Cary 306 Pro is rated Class A.
Playing the Touch through the same Cary Dac and with the results being equal sound quality, then it should have given a class A rating also.

The reviewer Kal Rubinson stated today on the Sqeezebox forum that the rating was just wrong.
He stated that he never rated, because at the time he was asked to rate it he only had it for a few days. He went on to state that he suggested to just add comments to see the review in the issue.
Somehow, someone who never reviewed the Touch then placed it in class D.

Also, guess what now, Kal's comments have been deleted.

Come On John, just because the Touch is only $299 dont change the facts.

___________________________________________________________
And John Atkinsons reply

>The Touch is made to be also used as a digital transport.

Yes, but that is not its primary use.

>John Atkinson, the Cary 306 Pro is rated Class A. Playing the Touch through the same Cary Dac and with the results being equal sound quality, then it should have given a class A rating also.

In your opinion, not mine. The rating I decide on for a product when I receive feedback from the review team is based on its unmodified performance in its fundamental role. That is can be made to sound better with, for exmaple, an upgraded power supply, or a modification to its firmware, or by using, as you have done an expensive outbard DAC is not something I take into account. (Though these things are mentioned in the review and will be mentioned in the accompnaying blurb in the next
"Recommended Components" listing.) Note that the entry for the Touch in "Recommended Components" specifically said "see KR's review in this issue."

>The reviewer Kal Rubinson stated today on the Sqeezebox forum that the rating was just wrong.

He subsequently deleted that posting

>He stated that he never rated, because at the time he was asked to rate it he only had it for a few days.

Stereophile's reviewers don't decide the ratings in "Recommended Components," I do, based on _all_ their comments both in their review and in private discussions and correspondence.

>He went on to state that he suggested to just add comments to see the review in the issue.

We don't list conventional products in "Recommended Components" without a rating, so Kal's request was not feasible.

>Somehow, someone who never reviewed the Touch then placed it in class D.

Not correct. While Kal wrote the formal review, we had three review samples of the Touch at the magazine. I decided on the rating based on Kal's description of the Touch's sound quality in the review used from its
analog outputs and on my own experience of using it, again from its analog outputs.

>Also, guess what now, Kal's comments have been deleted.

That was Kal's decision. Personally, I don't feel it approriate for a Stereophile writer to post private communications on the Web, but I didn't ask him to delete the post.

>Come On John, just because the Touch is only $299 dont change the facts.

I haven't. All is see is yet another example of someone annoyed that his favorite new toy has not got the highest possible rating in
Stereophile's "Recomended Components" listing. And please remember that even in Class D, that means we _recommend_ the product. The Touch is a great product at a great price. But by itself, it doens not deliver the
highest possible sound quality, which is what a Class A rating would mean.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile