Opinions on the SACD playback of Esoteric DV-50.

It matters not one wit what Harry thinks. That you are pleased, is all that counts.
At least that is what I think.

Squidboyw: I certainly agree with you that in the end, what is most important is how the owner, not the reviewer...feels about the equipment. But reviewer's opinions...and especially those of highly experienced reviewers like HP....ARE important to some of us. I am glad that Irishdog loves his DV-50, but he may not have had the unique opportunity to compare it systematically with other high-end multichannel SACD players. In this regard, we might glean some important information from the opinions of those like HP who have. Personally, I like to read a ton of reviews before I make buying decisions...but, in the end, i do let my ears decide.

I own a Sony SCD 777ES. I noticed that one of you thinks the Esoteric outdoes the Sony with SACD. I've been really tempted to buy one of these since they came out but have waited for some other universal players to come out. For CD, I use a Levinson 360S and use the Sony as a transport. My disadvantage is that I don't have much experience with other players. 95% of my listerning comes from the the Levinson/Sony combo, so If I make a change, Redbook CD performance is the most important factor. For DVD audio, I use a Techique's A10 which is not of the same caliber as the rest of my front end. While I'm not satisfied with either SACD or DVD-A as a medium with staying power, I can't ignore them, try as I might. So, is the Esoteric really that good? I've noticed quite a few of them for sale recently on this site. BTW, I wouldn't use the 360S with the esotieric if I went that way. I would have to sell it.