>>it is absolutely no surprise the today's PC hard drive configs don't compete
with EMM Labs gear.<<
Surprise? Who said this was a surprise?
>>good transports or bad, you can be pretty sure that your DAC is getting a
bit-perfect feed.<<
Okay.
>>jitter...replacing a transport with a hard drive will not remove this
problem.<<
You're not just replacing the transport with a hard drive; If you use
something like the Apogee Mini-Dac, you're also introducing a high quality
clock and DAC.
>>something other than jitter--at least as he was measuing it--was causing
an effect on his "perfect sound forever."<<
There are many things that go into making a great sounding DAC.
>>But for *really* good reproduction, it'll be years before anything beats a
CDP or TT.<<
That's vague. Depends on what you call a *really* good CDP. It has already
been established that a computer plus $1,000 DAC will not compete with
$10,000 Emm Labs gear, but neither will any other digital gear.
A computer plus $1,000 DAC absolutely sounds better to my ears than many
CD players.
with EMM Labs gear.<<
Surprise? Who said this was a surprise?
>>good transports or bad, you can be pretty sure that your DAC is getting a
bit-perfect feed.<<
Okay.
>>jitter...replacing a transport with a hard drive will not remove this
problem.<<
You're not just replacing the transport with a hard drive; If you use
something like the Apogee Mini-Dac, you're also introducing a high quality
clock and DAC.
>>something other than jitter--at least as he was measuing it--was causing
an effect on his "perfect sound forever."<<
There are many things that go into making a great sounding DAC.
>>But for *really* good reproduction, it'll be years before anything beats a
CDP or TT.<<
That's vague. Depends on what you call a *really* good CDP. It has already
been established that a computer plus $1,000 DAC will not compete with
$10,000 Emm Labs gear, but neither will any other digital gear.
A computer plus $1,000 DAC absolutely sounds better to my ears than many
CD players.