Kharma Ceramique 1.1 vs JM Labs Alto Utopia

I am very happy using only 30 watts. Thor TPA30 with the Kharma 1.0. I do think quality of watts are more important than the amount. ( in my opinion ) The Kharmas are my last stop for loudspeakers. I like them that much,but as the last guy said you gotta hear em to understand.I personally would only upgrade to another Kharma ,higher up the ladder.
The point I was trying to make was that the Kharmas do everything equally well ( great balance ) and I believe they are the most listenable speaker around. Good Luck

I dont think anything tops the tweeter of the Altos. I know people have their views on this but mine is that its accuracy, especially when driven with tubes, is wonderful and not tiring at all. The bass is good, not the sort of experience you would get with B&W 800s but sufficient for the space you describe. Dont forget they are quite large, though.

This thread is like comparing a Rolls to a Bently, both manufactor`s shine in certain area`s truely when you talk of speaker`s of this callibur it is better to let your own ear`s decide. I do own a pair a mezzo`s and have listened to the alto`s and the new BE tweeter is very impresive but on the other hand you have one of the best crossover in the industry with Kharma I know if I had a pair of Kharma`s instead of JM Lab I probably would be just as happy. I can say one thing I drive the mezzo`s with a mc352 at 350 aside and they dont lack in bottom end department. My room size is 20x24. David