2. speakers
  3. 1013384341

Martin-Logan Descent or Rel Stadium Subwoofer

I have heard great things on both subwoofers. I do have ML SL3's for which the Descent is made for(electrostatic speakers). The Rel's can adjust the mid-high frequencies for a seamless blend and are great on all types of designs so I have heard.. I believe the Descent cannot, only tuning for low frequency. Any opinions out there on these two subs considered for my speakers? The price point is about the same. Retail $3000. Thanks, Steve
7671
karls
332 posts
 
Sugarbrie, in filter design the term "high-pass" refers to a filter which "passes" the "high" frequencies, i.e., blocks out the low frequencies. Similarly, "low-pass" is a filter which blocks out high frequencies. Thus the RELs have no "high-pass" filters whatsoever; they allow the amp signal to run full-range to the mains without any interruption or filtering at all. They do, of course, have the best low-pass filters on the planet.
joej
2 posts
 
I have the Descent and it seems to match very well with my ML Reqeusts, Areius I's and Cinema. Once I put it in the room it just disappeared.

It puts out a ton of bass, I think I have the volume set to around 2.5 and it is not corner loaded.
jd798ff8
55 posts
 
Haven't yet heard the Descent. I have heard the Stadium III and good as it is, I'd suggest you also add the ACI Titan II to your short list. You could get a pair of Titan IIs for less than a Stadium III. The Titan II produces superbly accurate bass and integrates seamlessly.
Ag insider logo xs@2x
gtejr
17 posts
 
Well I just finished listening to the Rel Stadium and the Descent. I took the Descent home. It matches seamlessly with the Ml-Requests. The boys at ML did their homework.
The depth is fabulous and it is quick as can be. I highly recommend picking one up if you have the means.
More to discover