I have owned a pair of Dynaco A-25s for many years, since I bought them new in the early 1970s. (One got damaged a few years ago, but I was fortunate enough to be able to find a replacement.) While there are many other fine speakers out there, and doubtless a number with qualities which would be judged superior in many respects, the sonic quality of the Dynacos has stood up very well over time. They are neutral, natural, and musical in sound. One can listen to them for extended periods with no aural fatigue. They might not be the best speaker for high-volume rock, but they are excellent when played at moderate volumes in medium-sized rooms. After a short time, one stops listening to the speakers and simply listens to the music. When new, they were viewed as being in the same category as, and arguably superior to, speakers such as the AR-3a, the KLH 6 and the Larger Advent. I am very happy with mine. They might not be the latest or highest-performance equipment around. They are classic equipment, though, in the same way as a Martin D-28, a Gibson ES-175, an Ampeg B-15, a Leica M2, a Nikon F, an old Lotus 7, a 1964 Mustang, a Piper J-3, a Schweizer 1-23 or a Standard Cirrus -- not the ultimate in high performance, but simple, direct, straightforward, and offering enduring value. If you don't have lots of money, but you're lucky enough to find a pair of these in good working order with clean sound, don't haggle over the price, just buy them and take them home. You won't be sorry.
Cheap Thrills Dynaco A25 vs Sound Dynamics300ti?
Ok, don't laugh. I have been listening to my A25s and enjoy them, and have come across a pair of Sound Dynamics 300ti, which Harry Pearson expounded on. Any thoughts about the differences, which ones might be better? I just can't believe that speaker technology hasn't vastly improved in 30+ years. I am using tube gear with them, either a Fisher 400 or Lectron. Thanks.
- ...
- 9 posts total
- 9 posts total