Since your settings and set-up with the subs are likely to be ideally optimized differently for music and HT, you may not want to depend on them for your music reproduction if they're primarily used for HT. The best way around this is to go fuller-range on the mains, and push the sub response down in frequency so that they don't interfere with the music as much. For what sounds to me like actually a fairly large room size, and given your budget and dual-use intentions, I'd go floorstander on the speakers, and use the subs only for true sub-bass augmentation, or turn 'em off entirely when playing music. (Then again, I don't care about HT at all compared to music, and consequently don't even own an HT set-up [though I've sold 'em], so take my word only for what it's worth...)
Monitor speakers pros/cons
I am looking for general pros and cons to monitor type speakers(ie. not full range) vs the floor standing "fuller" range types. Application being 50% 2ch and 50% HT use. Price range $5000-$10k ish for the front mains. New/used this basic range.
I am wondering if to get a true sub 45hz speaker this range, one might need to spend more. Or with this price range one might be better off going with the monitor speakers. Has anybody dumped a lot of money into monitors, and if so what were the results. Also with general room limitations(less than 600sq feet) are the full size models just an honest over kill, and would the monitors interact with the room better?
Trying to learn..
Thanks
Marty
I am wondering if to get a true sub 45hz speaker this range, one might need to spend more. Or with this price range one might be better off going with the monitor speakers. Has anybody dumped a lot of money into monitors, and if so what were the results. Also with general room limitations(less than 600sq feet) are the full size models just an honest over kill, and would the monitors interact with the room better?
Trying to learn..
Thanks
Marty
- ...
- 16 posts total
- 16 posts total