The main thing I would miss is the lack of a box sound, the Maggies open and three dimensional qualities are refreshing and less distracting than any box speaker I have heard.
The next best thing is the smooth transition from bass to midrange/tweeter (I have the 1.6) which is an area that is very critical for me (the upper bass to lower midrange) there is so much information (with any music) in this area and I have no idea which driver is reproducing it because they blend so well so there is one less distraction and I can concentrate on music.
The last thing I really like about Maggies is the quality of the bass which is very fast and defined, you really get a sense of what is going on down there. This is especially nice with any synthesizer music (or anything percussion)which can go up and down the frequency range quickly and I guess this relates to the second quality I like which is the blending of the drivers.
To try and answer some of your other concerns,
I do not have an especially powerful amp and my speakers do not jump out at you like a dynamic driver can. If I had 500 watts with a lot of current there would be no problem, the Maggies can really jump on it with amazing dynamic range.
Sometimes I miss the 'weight' or sense of a 'solid mass' that a dynamic speaker has. The Maggies can sound lightweight, but this quality largley goes away with tons of power (which I had at one point when I auditoned an Innersound amp).
I can not really comment on missing box speakers because I have never owned one in a serious system (one time I had a Linn Index speaker in a 'transitional' system, when I thought I would not miss quality HI-FI I guess, BTW someone kick me if I do that again). I have gone from Maggie MG1 to Quad ESL 57 to Maggie 1.6 over the last 25 years.
this post is very biased and the only box speakers I get really excited about (that I have heard) are ATC's, Avalon's, and Wilson's which are all amazing.
It was fun ranting about my speakers, thanks
The next best thing is the smooth transition from bass to midrange/tweeter (I have the 1.6) which is an area that is very critical for me (the upper bass to lower midrange) there is so much information (with any music) in this area and I have no idea which driver is reproducing it because they blend so well so there is one less distraction and I can concentrate on music.
The last thing I really like about Maggies is the quality of the bass which is very fast and defined, you really get a sense of what is going on down there. This is especially nice with any synthesizer music (or anything percussion)which can go up and down the frequency range quickly and I guess this relates to the second quality I like which is the blending of the drivers.
To try and answer some of your other concerns,
I do not have an especially powerful amp and my speakers do not jump out at you like a dynamic driver can. If I had 500 watts with a lot of current there would be no problem, the Maggies can really jump on it with amazing dynamic range.
Sometimes I miss the 'weight' or sense of a 'solid mass' that a dynamic speaker has. The Maggies can sound lightweight, but this quality largley goes away with tons of power (which I had at one point when I auditoned an Innersound amp).
I can not really comment on missing box speakers because I have never owned one in a serious system (one time I had a Linn Index speaker in a 'transitional' system, when I thought I would not miss quality HI-FI I guess, BTW someone kick me if I do that again). I have gone from Maggie MG1 to Quad ESL 57 to Maggie 1.6 over the last 25 years.
this post is very biased and the only box speakers I get really excited about (that I have heard) are ATC's, Avalon's, and Wilson's which are all amazing.
It was fun ranting about my speakers, thanks