Kharma, Wilson Sophia, JM Labs I'm confussed????


I currently have the JM lab Micros (non BE). I'm driving them with a YBA passion integrated at 100w/ch. My room size is about 16x14x12. I'm thinking about upgrading to a full size speaker vs the monitors. I'm currently running my system with a REL Storm sub. It does fill in the bottom well, but it doesn't have the full range sound. I want to spend under 10k. my thought was used wilson's, or JM lab mezzos, or one of the Kharmas. i'd be anxious to hear some advice?
sea2
Nrchy:I have to agree ,I actually own the Kharma 1.0 also and recommended the 2.0 or 2.1 due to the actual closeness of sound to the 1.0. and the room size mentioned. I demo-ed 2.0 3.0 and 1.0 and they all sounded exceptional but haveing a large room with high ceilings I opted for the 1.0.
I am sure that all the speakers mentioned will do well ,but most of the Kharma owners tell you once you buy one,the only thing better is another more expensive Kharma. They are that magical...
Kharma, Kharma, Kharma, once you hear them you are stuck. I am on my second pair.

Like the post above once you hear them the only thing better is the more expensive one. Thorman said it quite well!
Fmpnd

I don't know what planet you are coming from, but i can assure you that my Kharma Grand Ceramique Midis are a precious comodity. These speakers blew my previous, the outstanding Egglestonworks Andra II, straight out of my rig. I could respect you objecting a certain aspect of these speakers performance, but to indiscriminately state that they suck simply shows me that you are catastrophically biased by your own personal agenda. Simply put, you piss me off!
Apointer4, you have been had. The great Fmpnd, (Frank) has one of the most unique Kharma's in the world. I wish I had the pair he has now.

See Frank, look what you started! LOL!

MM