Does anyone use a RUMBLE filter?

Dear Hdm: I think that if you take 10 persons with the experience you have and ask about their preferences on use a rumble filter or not use it you could get 9 answers that they don't use it and don't like it ( me between them. ), perhaps by ignorance.

I'm not against your prefrence because you are satisfied with and is you whom have to live hearing it.

Now, maybe I'm ignorant on the subject or I'm missing something or you know for sure something I don't. I would like that you can explain how is that a cartridge signal that pass for a rumble filter that is an additional electronic stage is not degraded ???? IMHO the best rumble filter is NO rumble filter, especially that in normal condition we don't need it.
If any one of us has a problem with those woofer movements and the system set up is correct then something on the audio system links is running wrong or exist a mistmatch in between or simple bad design item and in this case we have to change it.

I don't like to take an aspirin for a headache but is better to know why that headache coming and then fix it.

You like aspirns: good, nothing wrong with that. It's obvious that your music/sound priorities are different from mines that are to lose or add the less to the cartridge signal protecting its sensible integrity to be nearer to the recording.

Regards and enjoy the music,
}R.

For those filter advcocates remember that there are some amplifiers/preamps with " problems " in its design that suffer of low bass oscilations that could provoke those woofer movements.

As I said IMHO it's always better to fix the headache, that filter is an aspirin that really is solving nothing but degrading the audio signal.

R.

How are you degrading the audio signal when you're removing frequencies that cannot be reproduced by your speakers?

Dear Actusreus: I have to think that you posted as a joke.

Regards and enjoy the music,
R.

to continue actusreus thought, it's always a battle between what you can hear and what you think you can hear.