Dear Onhwy61: Well, I think that my post needs some explanation because the inverse RIAA eq. is a " necessary evil ": analog can't exist with out it.
From that point of view, we can't do nothing to " by-pass " it.
IMHO the higher and worst cartridge signal degradation take form through that RIAA eq.. We are talking of a curve with almost 20 +,- eq. over the frequency range where at the end always exist a frequency deviation that preclude flat frequency response. We are near the RIAA recordedd curve but not mimic exactly.
I think that between other critical subjects both RIAA eq. curves are important part of the analog Aquila heel.
No, it has no relation with the thread subject.
regards and enjoy the music,
R.
From that point of view, we can't do nothing to " by-pass " it.
IMHO the higher and worst cartridge signal degradation take form through that RIAA eq.. We are talking of a curve with almost 20 +,- eq. over the frequency range where at the end always exist a frequency deviation that preclude flat frequency response. We are near the RIAA recordedd curve but not mimic exactly.
I think that between other critical subjects both RIAA eq. curves are important part of the analog Aquila heel.
No, it has no relation with the thread subject.
regards and enjoy the music,
R.