I do believe the word unequalled may be a contentious one.Perhaps I should have elaborated .but this has been discussed in other Threads on turntable speed accuracy and I did not wish to complicate this one?
The JVC/Victor TT-101 has pretty good specs .
Wow and Flutter- within 0.02% WRMS
Speed deviation- 0.002%
Load characteristics- 0% (with a 120g total tracking force)
Drift- 0.0004%
But to me .printed specifications are meaningless when it comes to actual performance in relation to speed accuracy and consistency?
Until recently the concept of stylus drag on the speed performance of a turntable was treated with scepticism.
Then Ron Sutherland introduced the Timeline .a laser-flashing puck which sits over the turntable spindle and has a time-base accuracy of 2 parts per million.
With this device installed ..it provided scientific evidence of the phenomenon of stylus drag as the laser spot was seen to drift the moment the cartridge hit the record with most turntables .especially belt-drive ones.
The very best belt-drive turntables have reportedly been able to
maintain the stability of the laser dot of the Timeline ..when the speed has been adjusted with the cartridge already tracking the record. But then it is out of adjustment when no record is being tracked?
I have not witnessed any visual evidence of these accomplishments ..they are merely empirical claims.
I have not seen nor heard of any claims regarding the speed accuracy of Idler or Rim Drive turntables using the Timeline under stylus drag conditions.
I have tested the TT-101 under all conditions ..with and without stylus drag .and the laser dot of the Timeline does not deviate.
TT-101
This test has not been reproduced successfully with 3 arms and cartridges on and off ..with any other turntable to my knowledge?
Hence my statement?
If your turntable can match this performance ..please upload the evidence to YouTube and I will revise my statement to equalled but not exceeded :-)