Weiserb makes some good points but I stand by my guns. The responsibility of the seller is limited to communicating accurately and honestly to the buyer the condition and the performance of the equipment. No one can predict when a fault will occur--oh, that we only could!--so the notion that the buyer is entitled to make his own assessment and decide that the equipment is or isn't "good enough." is pretty fallacious.
As my friend Moe, the pawnshop owner, says, "You buy it, you bought it, baby." So long as the seller is ethical and honest, there is absolutely nothing inappropriate about that way of doing business.
I readily admit that I would LOVE to have the privilege to evaluate equipment and shove it back to the buyer if I didn't like it or it didn't perform the way I think it should. But to get that option, I go to a dealer and pay retail.
I fear that if Weiserb can't live with "as is, where is" we just will have to agree to be friends but not do business with each other. On the other hand, should I ever buy from him, I won't hold him responsible for anything other than honesty and accuracy.
I agree with one point, for sure: It's all about the music.
will
As my friend Moe, the pawnshop owner, says, "You buy it, you bought it, baby." So long as the seller is ethical and honest, there is absolutely nothing inappropriate about that way of doing business.
I readily admit that I would LOVE to have the privilege to evaluate equipment and shove it back to the buyer if I didn't like it or it didn't perform the way I think it should. But to get that option, I go to a dealer and pay retail.
I fear that if Weiserb can't live with "as is, where is" we just will have to agree to be friends but not do business with each other. On the other hand, should I ever buy from him, I won't hold him responsible for anything other than honesty and accuracy.
I agree with one point, for sure: It's all about the music.
will