MIT Oracle AC2-- anyone with experience?

I listend to the newer MIT powercables as well. Compare them with Purist Audio and you will understand why they are superior.

In 16 years of time I have done thousends of tests with cables. The biggest difference is that instruments and voices are a lot more realistic in proportion. The stage is more intimate.

The articulation of voices is a lot more open and clear with the Purist Audio powercables as well.

It also gives a much more physical 3 D stage compared to the MIT.

MIT would wise they could achieve this level!!

Very interestink (by Schultz)danke.

MIT has not done a lot of research in the last years. Audioquest has made a much bigger improvement.

In one year of time I did win all battles against clients who lend MIT cables. It is that easy.

There is a lot of work to do for MIT!!

In both my digital and analog the AC2 is a game changer for power cords. Incredible all round. If you want to know what your equipment can really do....

It is still a nice powercable, but in technique it is not the best anymore. Quality is Always based on the moment. After time it changes.

Newer powercables like the Purist Audio go further in parts as black level, articulation of voices, intimate stage and even drive, control and dynamics.

MIT needs to do more research in technique to catch up. In all the comparisons with MIT cables I can make the conclussion that they are behind some other brands. It has become quite easy to create a higher level with cables like Audioquest and Purist Audio.