I was on the Supratek website the other night.Mick has a blog that has some interesting info on his work with computer audio.Good reading.
Should Sound Quality of Computer Audio be improved
Unable to respond to, "Mach2Music and Amarra: Huge Disappointment"- Thread. Other Members take free pop-shots!
Apparently some have more Freedom Of Speech than others! I
don't know how many times I have said it, I want Computer
Audio to succeed! It will only succeed if Computers are designed from the ground up to reproduce Music (Same minimum standard applied for Equipment of ALL Audio Formats)! This is common sense Audio Engineering Design. Bandaid Modifications cannot be substituted for absence in design to produce Music! Design it right to EARN the right to become a New Audio Format- same as all other Audio Formats! No Freebee's, No Cutting Corners! Lack of design is what's causing such varied results in S.Q. between
listeners of Computer Audio. I see about 50% negative
responses here on these Threads. It will continue to happen unless you fix it! Blaming me won't help! I am an
Engineer, and I can read results! 50/50 success/ failure
rate- you have an inherit Engineering Design Flaw for the
reproduction of Music via Computers! Shock! Suprise- since
they were never designed for Music! So when is someone finally going to properly design the Equipment/Computer
(From the ground up) for Computer Audio? Do we continue
to treat any real criticism as "HERESY" in the lack of
design in Computer Audio for Music? You tell me what I am
allowed to talk about, and we will both know!
Apparently some have more Freedom Of Speech than others! I
don't know how many times I have said it, I want Computer
Audio to succeed! It will only succeed if Computers are designed from the ground up to reproduce Music (Same minimum standard applied for Equipment of ALL Audio Formats)! This is common sense Audio Engineering Design. Bandaid Modifications cannot be substituted for absence in design to produce Music! Design it right to EARN the right to become a New Audio Format- same as all other Audio Formats! No Freebee's, No Cutting Corners! Lack of design is what's causing such varied results in S.Q. between
listeners of Computer Audio. I see about 50% negative
responses here on these Threads. It will continue to happen unless you fix it! Blaming me won't help! I am an
Engineer, and I can read results! 50/50 success/ failure
rate- you have an inherit Engineering Design Flaw for the
reproduction of Music via Computers! Shock! Suprise- since
they were never designed for Music! So when is someone finally going to properly design the Equipment/Computer
(From the ground up) for Computer Audio? Do we continue
to treat any real criticism as "HERESY" in the lack of
design in Computer Audio for Music? You tell me what I am
allowed to talk about, and we will both know!
- ...
- 432 posts total
Thanks for the tip on the Supratek blog. http://supratekaudio.blogspot.com/. Very interesting and somewhat surprising. Regards, |
And yet, Chadeffect, I am looking at High Res. Optical Disks on "Elusive Disks". They are claimed to have been Remastered at 32 Bits, and are claimed to be playable in all CD Players. New Releases in Vinyl on harder material 180 Gram Records are springing up all over. Now if the Sound Quality of these is even better than 24/192 High Res. Downloads (Big if-plus there is possibility of DXD), someone is going to want to know how they can get 32 Bit/ DXD Downloads. The heat is on High Res. Computer Audio Downloads to compete in sound quality. THIS is EXACTLY what I am talking about! The exact opposite would be true in a single Audio Format of exclusive Music Audio Downloads. A tide raises all boats. With competition we stand to get more "Bang for the Buck" in Sound Quality. Without it Sound Quality gets stuck in the mud. This would really be a bad business decision for the Consumer to eliminate all of his options (Formats) in this Market. Bad Call- Bad Timing!!! Of course embraising this competition puts more heat on Computer Manufacturers to cut into their Profits to boost sound quality. They will be forced to come up with a way to Download 32 Bit Releases, if not DXD. That is going to cost them a pretty penny. They are not blind to this, a single Format (Downloading) being way more Profitable for them without any other competing Format. Is it out of profitable convenience for them to convince as much of the American Public as possible that "No one is really interested in Higher Sound Quality". Is it really true, or just a "Profitable" Myth being perpetuated? I still hear rumors of the Major Picture Industry concidering using DXD in their Soundtracks for their Movies. Finally, there might be some real competition to get the ball rolling on sound quality! |
My point, Hfisher, is if someone were to come out with an High Resolution Optical Disc Format (With Properly Remastered Release) that turned out to sound better than High Res. Downloads- I would still want both options. I keep on seeing 32 Bit Mastered Optical Disks being sold on "Elusive Disks". They claim that these Disks can still be played on a regular CD Player. New Releases of Vinyl on much harder material in "180 Gram" might be promising- same source. What I want is the freedom to try these things, and determine for myself weither the Sound Quality is worth it or not. Of course quality of original Recording will determine Sound Quality, unless Remastering really helps. Experimenting still going on, and I want to have the options of trying these things. Still think Meridian Lossless Packing was the best sounding Optical Disk Format that I ever heard. I am still smarting from THAT option being yanked from the Music Selection Department. This is what I see with my light bulb on, a whole lotta damn good sounding Music going to waste. It isn't pretty. Single Format market of Downloading, no matter how inevitable it might be or if anyone desires it, could cost us alot in selection of High Sound Quality Audio Formats. No Audio Market likes uncertainty, I don't like it either. This is the reason that I need something really substantial in Music Selection for whatever High Resolution Audio Format the Audio Market accepts. Careful with those light bulbs, you might not like what you see. You will see the "The Good-The Bad- and the Ugly" in sharp relief of any Format. One question: Can't find "Ladies' Jazz Vol.5" on optical Disk. I have been streaming it, and it sounds really good- especially Julie London with tons of depth soundstage. I am getting the feeling that it only exists as MP3 or as a Download. Can't tie down the source other than Warner Music Poland. Don't want to use i-Tunes, don't like mixing MAC Software with Windows 7 PC. I had a hell of a time getting rid of it- not again! This isn't the first time that I have come across Music only available as a Download. It won't be the last (Yeah, Yeah...I know. Just Download it, and Burn it!). Would like to know of the original source. Can't seem to find it with many Downloadable releases- Uncertainty??? It isn't available in HD Tracks. Other than i-Tunes, where is it at? |
- 432 posts total