It's not the price of the Berhinger that puts me off, but the fact that it appears to digitally upsample and then downsample to do its crossing over. I can't imagine that would be good for the signal, even at 24/96. Kenn39 - what have you heard about its application?
I purchased a used Bryston 10b-sub, and will give that a shot. The distribution of frequencies that they chose is not all that suitable to my desired 120hz Xover frequency: they use:
50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 250, 300, 400, 500.
Bryston will change out the resistors at a cost. I will play around with the available frequencies, but think I may modify it to:
70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 115, 120, 130, 140, 160, 200, 250
The rolloff slopes are choosable b/t 6, 12 an 18 db/octave. It may be worthwhile to leave a gap between high pass and low pass, and I'm not sure how big of a gap, that's why I'm thinking of using high resolution around 115 hz, my target area. Any thoughts or suggestions?
Thanks, Peter S.
wouldn't ever do that to my signal, although it is probably very effective frequency wise.
I purchased a used Bryston 10b-sub, and will give that a shot. The distribution of frequencies that they chose is not all that suitable to my desired 120hz Xover frequency: they use:
50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 250, 300, 400, 500.
Bryston will change out the resistors at a cost. I will play around with the available frequencies, but think I may modify it to:
70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 115, 120, 130, 140, 160, 200, 250
The rolloff slopes are choosable b/t 6, 12 an 18 db/octave. It may be worthwhile to leave a gap between high pass and low pass, and I'm not sure how big of a gap, that's why I'm thinking of using high resolution around 115 hz, my target area. Any thoughts or suggestions?
Thanks, Peter S.
wouldn't ever do that to my signal, although it is probably very effective frequency wise.