Clever Little Clock - high-end audio insanity?

Geoff,

Common man, I am trying to help you here. I think that the CLC is a fascinating device. I thought that I would offer audiophiles a glimpse into the explanation. Notice, I did not provide the complete explanation. With all this talk about the CLC you should have a bunch of orders.

I think people here think I am being sarcastic, but I am completely serious. Plus I think that time effect that we discussed is entirely possible. People here should read Steven Hawkin's Brief History of Time.

In fact, I would venture to say that most of the "accepted" audio imporvements are probably just as imaginary. For example, many people claim that they can hear a difference between WBT or Cardas connectors (binding posts and RCA plugs) vs. regular Radio Shack types. Also, many people claim to hear a difference between different types of insulation.

I am willing to put down $10,000 cash on a challange of any double-blind scientifically organized listening test. If the listener can identify WBT posts versus 50 cent posts from Radio Shack in a double-blind listening test, then I will pay this person $10,000.

Anyone care to accept the challenge?

So, please stop trashing the CLC when you people accept other ridiculous accessories.

And Elizabeth, if mdhoover would have set up the same listening experiment for what I just proposed above, his group would of had nearly identical results.

Also, let's keep in mind that the CLC can alter time, and the WBT posts, that cost like $200 for a set of speakers, cannot. So which is a better value?

Oh, before I forget, I will also pay anyone $10,000 who can correctly identify a difference between a $2000 fancy power cord (you can choose your favorite manufacturer) and a $2 computer grade power cord from CompUSA in a scientific double-blind listening test.

Anyone care to accept my challange???