Clever Little Clock - high-end audio insanity?

Sherod, that would be a dead giveaway. Besides, it's not terribly likely that this testing will occur in my system. I still have to get back to Audioari1 regarding setting up a test in Chicago, a geographically central location to the both of us.

TBG, about engineering, my degree shows as Bsc. of Applied Science, Chemical Engineering. Much 'basic' research is done by engineers, BTW.
As for large planets 'falling' faster than smaller ones, I would rethink that if I were you, even if it does seem like 'common sense'.
Salut, Bob P.

Does any one really believe this will resolve the matter as to whether or not the CLS works? There was a recent report where MRIs were used with partisans of both party and what happened when they got information that contridicted their partisan beliefs. The anger and emotions part of their brain grew active. For some reasons the researchers did not include less partisan individuals.

I expect both parties here will be emotionally connected to their positions.

Even if there is agreement among them, it makes me no more or less likely to try the CLC. This is the same for DBT. Now if somehow MRIs could be used to see if both individuals reacted differently when the CLC was in the room, I would be most interested.

From reading several threads on the CLC, I am making the hypothesis that the device is based on Radionics principle. This discipline was theorized and put first into practice by Dr. Albert Abrams (1863 - 1924), and later further developed by other alternative health practicianers. In recent times the same subliminal space structure has also been called the Web Effect. According to radionic principles, all visible matter is immersed in a 'fluid' of 'subtle energy fields) or 'subtle frequencies' that govern its outward state. These field cannot be seen nor measured by classical scientific probes or engineering instruments, but can be detected, measured, then modified by a practicianer, usually but not necessarily, through the aid of a focusing or conduit device.
Interestingly enough, as the triad of practicianer, conduit and target subject do not operate at a level of classical physics, but through higher-dymensional 'subtle energy' transfers, neither the gross physical properties of the conduit device (such as the CLC) nor the spatial orientation of the triad, nor the type or degree of connectivity between the interacting components )(audiophile, CLC, audio system) have any real bearing with the induced results, as it is said that Radionics can operate with thousands of miles of separation between the components. Furthermore, as AudioAri1 aptly implies, if the CLC were in fact a Radionicsor web-effect -driven device, it would cause time distortions, translations, or cancellations, as its higher-dymensional principle of operations would bypass the strictures of classic space. Hence no need of cumbersome connectivity between CLC and equipment, nor in fact need of line-of-sight operation. I venture to say that Mr. Kait could easily create a more powerful version of the CLC, perhaps to be dubbed a CMC (or Clever Master Clock, or more accurately the WMC (Web Master Clock)) to reside permantly on his premises. The device would in principle be able to influence any audio system against which it was directed to operate by Mr. Kait. In this configuration and business model Mr. Kait could operate the CMC as a service to audiophiles based on a monthly or annual subscription. Audiophiles would also benefit from any enhancements Mr. Kait made to the WMC without the bother of having to send their own devices back for upgrade. It is worth pointing out that space invariance and insensitivity in Radionics was discovered and put into practice already in the distant 1930s.

Well, that certainly sound like a much better bang-for-the-buck then you are likely to get with any power cord, interconnet, or speaker cable!