Clever Little Clock - high-end audio insanity?

Sorry Wellfed, I realize that's not what you wanted to hear. . . The good news is that I still may be proven wrong. . . . and that my skepticism may turn out to be unjustified. Enjoy the CLC!

Guidocorona, do you not want to add "within your understanding of known physics?"

If he used Scaller waves he could find the way thru to the other side.Tom

Well Tbg, I think we can safely assume, not within *your* understanding of known physics, to judge by your take on the effects of gravity on weighty planets and such. But don't feel alone, the CLC etc. doesn't fall within *anybody's* (including Mr. Kait's) understanding of physics, known or unknown. This device, like a great many other things in this world, works on deception (both of the self and by others) and belief. To me, belief is the antithesis of the pursuit of knowledge. For skeptics like myself, the CLC would merely function as a 20X-overpriced travel alarm, fully explainable by the known principles of physics, psychology and irrational economics.

That's reasonable Norm. . here it is:

"Not at all Wellfed, merely that the CLC does not operate on the equipment in the domain of physics as I understand it, but on the user in the psychosomatic
domain."

Yet, as I said in other places, my personal opinion is hardly relevant. Thus, I do invite Geoff Kait to submit his scholarly paper on CLC theory of operations to Nature, Science, New Scientist, and even Science News for peer review and eventual publication. When the paper is accepted for publication in any of these journals, I shall bow my head to such obviously misunderstood greatness. . . until such time, I will hold to what still appears to me to be the canonical mainstream, which is by the way quite weird enough all by itself.