Clever Little Clock - high-end audio insanity?

That's reasonable Norm. . here it is:

"Not at all Wellfed, merely that the CLC does not operate on the equipment in the domain of physics as I understand it, but on the user in the psychosomatic
domain."

Yet, as I said in other places, my personal opinion is hardly relevant. Thus, I do invite Geoff Kait to submit his scholarly paper on CLC theory of operations to Nature, Science, New Scientist, and even Science News for peer review and eventual publication. When the paper is accepted for publication in any of these journals, I shall bow my head to such obviously misunderstood greatness. . . until such time, I will hold to what still appears to me to be the canonical mainstream, which is by the way quite weird enough all by itself.

Thanks again Guido, I will do just that.

I did email one of the scientists whose work was cited by Mr. Kait in the M.D. article on how he purports the "Intelligent Chip" may work, but so far no response, which although slightly disappointing, does not exactly surprise me. Maybe I will try again with another name from his citation list. But as far as I can tell, Mr. Kait has offered no equivalent explanation for how the CLC is supposed to work, so presumably there is no paper, scholarly or otherwise, to submit for the time being...

Zaikesman, you are right, my mistake. I was hoping Mr. Kait would see it fit to submit the very article explaining the IC rather than CLC. Yet the whole family of devices seem to be aledged to operate on broadly similar fantastic premises.