DK Design VS.1 Reference mkII - Optimization

Work in progress....My speakers don't really allow me to turn up the volume much past the 9 o'clock position with out involving the neighbors and I also noticed the lack of heat produced and decided to try something to see if it improved the performance. In the past my MC275 tube amp sounded ok at lower levels but really started performing at the higher volume levels. Anyway I have a sony cd with an adjustable output so I simply dropped the input signal and cranked up the DK to the between the 11 & 1 o'clock positiion to see if hopefully it works a little better. I think I may be on to something.....
Does anyone have any info on what the pots on the preamp board relate to? I remember reading something about the adjustablity of the input...
The meter is not as entertaining but I am thinking at this point that it sounds better.....

Tvad, I am telling you the amp sounds better with the aluminum cover off. In an industry where people use little pebbles, roller blocks, and expensive power cords I find it surprising that you should have difficulty accepting that the aluminum cover degrades the sound of the amp while a Lexan cover does not.

Also, while aluminum is non-magnetic it still will bounce more of the EMI then a Lexan cover will. If you shoot an electron into an aluminum plate the results are very different then if you shoot an electron into a Lexan plate.

I have not tried ERS paper, but one manufacturer that supplies a lexan cover instead of an aluminum one is DartZeel. Their amplifier, as you can see in a lot of literature, is supplied with a clear cover specifically for that reason.

Maybe shoot an email to DartZeel to explain this effect in more detail?

Also, while I believe that almost all components sound better with the aluminum cover off, this effect is especially prevalent in the DK amplifer where the difference is quite dramatic.