oddly, i owned the 350 reference, the mc501s and have extensive experience w/ the JC1s.
in terms of absolute accuracy, the JC1s are the pick of the 3. in terms of what i'd own, i own the macs.
and i thought the belles sounded the best of them all.
now, if that doesn't confuse you, nothing will!
(i'll be brief. JC1s: awesome power and clarity, but heat and system matching w/ a hot treble in my WP6s precluded it. 501s: see my review on dagogo.com for IMO the most accurate representation of mac SS amps---they're NOT perfect, but they are good enough! and the 350 ref: great sound & quite a bargain, but build quality concerned me (bias on both channels wasn't equal, and i was told by the mfg it was unimportant?!?), and i hated the fact that it didn't have a soft start circuit, leading it to trip my circuit breaker (dedicated 20a) each time i turned it on. talk about user unfriendly!).
rhyno
in terms of absolute accuracy, the JC1s are the pick of the 3. in terms of what i'd own, i own the macs.
and i thought the belles sounded the best of them all.
now, if that doesn't confuse you, nothing will!
(i'll be brief. JC1s: awesome power and clarity, but heat and system matching w/ a hot treble in my WP6s precluded it. 501s: see my review on dagogo.com for IMO the most accurate representation of mac SS amps---they're NOT perfect, but they are good enough! and the 350 ref: great sound & quite a bargain, but build quality concerned me (bias on both channels wasn't equal, and i was told by the mfg it was unimportant?!?), and i hated the fact that it didn't have a soft start circuit, leading it to trip my circuit breaker (dedicated 20a) each time i turned it on. talk about user unfriendly!).
rhyno