Otto, you wrote:
(1) "I already decided to have our local ARC service guy look at the whole amp..."
Me: Good call.
(2) "One question regarding my original V5 tube: when checking it with the right meter on the front panel, it did not reach the green area any more. I tried to adjust it, but even in the "full" position, the meter was not in the green area (but close to). There was no acustic [sic] impact to be heard though. Is this a sign of age of the tube?"
Me: It could be.
(3) "Is it necessary to replace then - or should I wait for any acustic impact before replacing it?"
Me: Absolutely not!! If those tubes are outside the 2000 use marker, as Gary (Hifigeek) said, you are living on borrowed time. The tube's propensity to fail and take out passives (e.g., bias resisters) increases with age.
Otto ... it appears that you are not sure how much time has been racked up on the tubes. I am hesitant to recommend this, but if you have serious doubts about hours of use, replace the tubes as soon as possible.
One more suggestion -- the amp is not that terribly old by ARC standards. Having said that, I find it odd that the amp may have blown other passives like caps, or required some circuit board repairs. I suggest you contact Kalvin Dahl or Chris Ossana (the Service Manager) at ARC and ask them if the local ARC tech should specifically perform certain diagnostics to ascertain whether other parts need to be replaced.
I am also hesitant to suggest my next point, but I would certainly include it in the conversation. If one of the circuit boards looks discolored because of a passive failure, I would ask Kal or Chris whether it would make more sense to simply replace the suspect board.
The Ref 300 is an expensive piece of gear. To sound its best, it should be put into tip-top operating order. That includes fresh tubes if warranted. And as I said above, I would make sure that both amps are thoroughly looked over.
P.S. Did you recently but the Ref 300? If so, I wonder if its worth returning it if that's an option.
(1) "I already decided to have our local ARC service guy look at the whole amp..."
Me: Good call.
(2) "One question regarding my original V5 tube: when checking it with the right meter on the front panel, it did not reach the green area any more. I tried to adjust it, but even in the "full" position, the meter was not in the green area (but close to). There was no acustic [sic] impact to be heard though. Is this a sign of age of the tube?"
Me: It could be.
(3) "Is it necessary to replace then - or should I wait for any acustic impact before replacing it?"
Me: Absolutely not!! If those tubes are outside the 2000 use marker, as Gary (Hifigeek) said, you are living on borrowed time. The tube's propensity to fail and take out passives (e.g., bias resisters) increases with age.
Otto ... it appears that you are not sure how much time has been racked up on the tubes. I am hesitant to recommend this, but if you have serious doubts about hours of use, replace the tubes as soon as possible.
One more suggestion -- the amp is not that terribly old by ARC standards. Having said that, I find it odd that the amp may have blown other passives like caps, or required some circuit board repairs. I suggest you contact Kalvin Dahl or Chris Ossana (the Service Manager) at ARC and ask them if the local ARC tech should specifically perform certain diagnostics to ascertain whether other parts need to be replaced.
I am also hesitant to suggest my next point, but I would certainly include it in the conversation. If one of the circuit boards looks discolored because of a passive failure, I would ask Kal or Chris whether it would make more sense to simply replace the suspect board.
The Ref 300 is an expensive piece of gear. To sound its best, it should be put into tip-top operating order. That includes fresh tubes if warranted. And as I said above, I would make sure that both amps are thoroughly looked over.
P.S. Did you recently but the Ref 300? If so, I wonder if its worth returning it if that's an option.