Naim amplification with quad ESL

Tried a NAP 200 with the quads using NACA5 and it sounded extremely good. I am also using MC2275 and now I don't know which one to keep. Reading the posts, some say naim is the antithesis of tubes but it is remarkable how similar they sound. My ears must be broken. Tonality is very similar. Naim has more attack and pace and imaging is more defined and sold. The mc has slightly richer midrange and more airy highs. Voices has a ghostly effect and more holograhic.

Creilly, with the quads, how much better is the 250.2 comparing to 200?

Glai :

I have never heard a 200 so I cannot comment on how much better the 250.2 is. I know that when I used the 110 it drove them just fine. They tend to prefer lower powered amps anyhow. The 250.2 was certainly much more authoritative. Which model of Quads are they?

Quads are 2805s

Creilly, do u find Naim to be slightly dry sounding?