Class-D amps - a different re view


Martin Colloms, the editor of HiFi Critic (ad-free mag from the UK) have recently published the review of several different Class-D amps, together with an in depth technical analysys and measurments.

His conclusions were not favourable, to say at least:

"I regret that not a single model merits unqualified recommendation. Price is not the issue; the poor listening tests speak for themselves. (...)
At present we have to take the prudent view that good sound might be possible from switching amps, but we haven't heard it yet."

BelCanto REF1000 (ICEpower) - score 10.5 pooints
"The ICE power module used has a dependable reputation, and the design is well built and finished as a whole. While I would not suggest that you shouldn't try this amp, on sound quality grounds alone I cannot recommend it for audiophile use."

Channel Islands D100 (UcD) - score 13 pooints
"While I have reservations about a number of aspects of sound quality, and advise personal audition, given the solid lab results (...) the overall performance and the moderate price, these CA Audio monos do make it to the 'worth considering' cathegory."

NuForce 8.5V2 (proprietary technology) - score 9 pooints
"Yes, the price is good for the power output. Yes it's pretty, light, small and runs cool. However, the sound quality simply does not justify recommendation." (on top of that the NuForce amp measured very poorly - Elb)

Pro-Ject Amp Box (Flying Mole) - score 5 points
"I'm sorry to say that Project (...) was a real disappointment in the listening tests, and can't be recommended."

Just as a point of reference, recently reviewed Krell 700CX scored 100 points, CJ Premier 350 - 110 points and ARC Ref 110 - 135 points.

At least someone have had the balls to say it. This is why HiFi Critic is THE mag to subscribe.
128x128elberoth2
Kijanki, I agree completely- and will add that many of today's specifications exist to sell certain types of amplifiers rather than get to the truth of the sonics.
I think Kijanki is right: Martin Colloms' statements about the 17 weak points of class D have no solid scientific foundation. I wonder where he gets such information.

Chris
No I am not from Denmark. Nielsens doctorate is available on internet. I own Rowland 102. At first sound was a little "lean" and sharp but over time it mellowed. It needs a little more "chestiness" (lower midrange) - improved after switching speaker cables to Acoustic Zen Satori. Transparency and Clarity is great. Bass performance is outstanding. Stereophile, 6Moons and others had glowing reviews of different class D amps - also Channel Islands D100 (based on Hypex modules - and no I am not Dutch either). The very best class D amps are probably Kharma (not Icepower) and Red Dragon (both too expensive for me). Sound is a matter of taste (so to speak). There is no rights or wrongs. Tube amps producing/exaggerate even harmonics sound wonderful on guitar or voice but horrible on instruments with more complex harmonic structure like piano. Piano structure is a little like percussion instruments that not follow simple harmonic structure and often sounds "out of tune" on warm amps. I prefer neutral amps. The question also should be "what is best for the money" - class D is difficult to beat.
Elberoth2, I don't know where Kijanki is from, but would I be in my more waring moods, my argument would parallel his, for the most part. I live in California.

Not having heard ICE ASP module, I can't comment. Their 500A, mated with a great linear power supply can put your system in just this side of heaven made.
Kijanki - ok, fair enough. I would like to know though, why do you think that:

1. Pushing broad band radio frequency noise into the power supply outlets
2. Pushing broad band radio frequency noise out of the line and ground connections

is considered OK by you. Those are just two first Colloms points. You said they are rubbish.