2. amps-preamps
  3. 1192052948

Class-D amps - a different re view

Martin Colloms, the editor of HiFi Critic (ad-free mag from the UK) have recently published the review of several different Class-D amps, together with an in depth technical analysys and measurments.

His conclusions were not favourable, to say at least:

"I regret that not a single model merits unqualified recommendation. Price is not the issue; the poor listening tests speak for themselves. (...)
At present we have to take the prudent view that good sound might be possible from switching amps, but we haven't heard it yet."

BelCanto REF1000 (ICEpower) - score 10.5 pooints
"The ICE power module used has a dependable reputation, and the design is well built and finished as a whole. While I would not suggest that you shouldn't try this amp, on sound quality grounds alone I cannot recommend it for audiophile use."

Channel Islands D100 (UcD) - score 13 pooints
"While I have reservations about a number of aspects of sound quality, and advise personal audition, given the solid lab results (...) the overall performance and the moderate price, these CA Audio monos do make it to the 'worth considering' cathegory."

NuForce 8.5V2 (proprietary technology) - score 9 pooints
"Yes, the price is good for the power output. Yes it's pretty, light, small and runs cool. However, the sound quality simply does not justify recommendation." (on top of that the NuForce amp measured very poorly - Elb)

Pro-Ject Amp Box (Flying Mole) - score 5 points
"I'm sorry to say that Project (...) was a real disappointment in the listening tests, and can't be recommended."

Just as a point of reference, recently reviewed Krell 700CX scored 100 points, CJ Premier 350 - 110 points and ARC Ref 110 - 135 points.

At least someone have had the balls to say it. This is why HiFi Critic is THE mag to subscribe.
128x128elberoth2
guidocorona
4,298 posts
 
Hi AR_T, please try post here a super simplified version of the explanation as you know it.

MRT, I am terribly sorry to learn about your physical and spiritual suffering caused by panels, solid state, switching amplification, and other such admittedly uncivilized, raw, and aggressive sounding technologies. In a sense I deem myself fortunate that -- being somewhat of an uncivilized and unrefined pragmatist myself -- I seem not to suffer from such horribly insidious and generalized malaises. . . . heck, I am so bad I even find tubed equipment can be delightful and eminently listenable.
atmasphere's avatar
atmasphere
11,942 posts
 
For my ears, Class D amp builders are not trying to achieve a sound like tubes or solid state. They are trying to amplify the truest signal to their ability.

This comment sounds like a strawman to me: I know a fair nubmer of conventional amplifier designers (tube and solid state) who have the same goal- this is nothing unique to class D!
getheleadout
144 posts
 
I use CI D200s to drive my 104db sensitivity Klipsch LaScala and find the results spectacular. My guestimation as to why some people don't like the sound is because they don't like whats actually happening upstream. I find the D200 to be the most accurate amps I've heard. They have no sound of their own. They just get out of the way and let the music come through, like it or not.
Post removed 
guidocorona
4,298 posts
 
"I know a fair nubmer of conventional amplifier designers. . ., (tube and solid state) who have the same goal. . ."

That's precisely the point Ralph, the ultimate goal often enough remains the same -- as it should -- regardless of underlying technology.
More to discover