Tube amp for Magnepan 3.5 with autoformers.


I just purchased a set of 3.5s and am using a Plinius 9200. I would like to get a tube amp but know Maggies need alot of power. I am considering Speltz autoformers. Any sugesstions? I don't know how much power I will need with the autoformers. Am I better off without the autoformers as I have no experience with them? My budget is under $2500 used. I listen to mainly accoustic, female vocals, and jazz but do listen to some rock and classical. My room is 17 x 28. Would I be better off with a tube pre and a ss amp? I know there are alot of threads on Maggies and amps but would like to hear some fresh ideas.

Thanks, Pal.
Ag insider logo xs@2xpal
Thanks for all the input. I spent a couple of hours with my buddy finding the best speaker placement and that improved the sound. After finding the right location we put the spikes on the MYE stands and that also provided better focus. I like the sound of the 9200 but would still like some tubes in the mix, so I may stick with a SS amp and go with a tube pre. I do not listen extreamly loud so I wonder if a 100 watt Plinius amp would be enough power. The 9200 has 200 watts a channel but I don't belive it doubles into 4 ohms. It has enough power for my listening levels.
Guys, just a thought:
the 3.5s are bi-wireable, thus, bi-ampable... wouldn't 2 tube amps (of the same kind/type) work some magic?

2 tube amps of different kinds/types would need some cross-over, but 2 of the same would not as a preamp with 2 outputs would do just fine.

what do you think?

i hope this is not OT :-|

Thanks
.e.
I'm using a Mac tube amp with 1.6's and nordost cables and am very pleased. I crank it up on occasion and no issues with the sound or the amp.
Steve McCormick reports that using his amps with the ZEROs to drive 4 ohm speakers sounds better than driving the speaker directly, despite the fact that his amplifiers are easily capable of driving 4 ohms.

I interviewed several solid state amplifier manufacturers at CES this year, all of which made amps that are considered 'high current' and easily double power into 4 ohms. There was a consensus amongst them; transistor amplifiers will sound better into 16 ohms than they will into 4, apparently due to the effects of current through the output devices, which is deleterious to the sonic performance **even though the amp easily makes the power**.

This is a powerful argument for using the ZEROs with any transistor amplifier as this precisely what it does: loads the amp at 16 ohms.

You will loose power this way with a transistor amp- a 100 watt amplifier will suddenly be putting out 50 watts, but it will be a better-sounding 50 watts.

The effect of using tubes with the ZERO is different- in many cases you do get better sound, but in some cases you also get more power and wider bandwidth, especially in the bass. Most transformer-coupled tube amps suffer a loss of power and low frequency bandwidth when running on the 4 ohm taps; the ZERO is a way around this.

I drive my 3.6's with an Audio Research VT200 (200 w/ch) tube amp with the autoformers so the amp sees an 8 ohm load. I like how it sounds, the autoformers took a while to break in but are well worth it. When I use my D400 MKII I do not use the autoformers, the amp is solid state and will deliver more power (400s/ch)into 4 ohms than the VT200 will. The tubes sound the best.
There is a VT200 on Audiogon for $2995 with new tubes, a pretty good deal. Good luck.