New Rowland Criterion 2-chassis battery pre


Jeff Rowland Design has just created a page for its upcoming statement-level, twin chassis, battery powered full function preamplifier. Detail is still scant, but a little bit of info is already available, in addition to front and rear view pics. Here’s the page:
http://jeffrowland.com/Criterion.htm
And here’s the front view:
http://jeffrowland.com/Criterion-front.htm
And here’s the rear view:
http://jeffrowland.com/Criterion-back.htm

You will find a few specs already on the site. JRDG should be publishing more info in the next few weeks. I will post here as I receive it. in addition to the published specs that you can read on the page above, here are a very few additional tidbits that I have learned this far:

. Uses Burr Brown TI OPA1632 high speed fully differentially balanced modules.
. Includes phono stage.
. Uses standard NiMH D-cell batteries available in most electronics stores, loaded in 2 rear-inserted tubes of power supply chassis.
. Capable of AC/DC operation . . . will recharge batteries on independent circuit during AC operation.
. Full remote control
. Target price $18K (not sure yet)
. Availability: probably early Fall 2008.
. Will be featured at RMAF in Soundings Hifi suite Marriott 503 or 505 from Oct 10th to 12th in Denver.

And sorry folks, I have not heard this device yet. Nor I have any good third party reports on its sound. Any speculations on Sonics from my part would be just. . . pure speculations. I’ll keep everyone posted as I learn more.

Guido
guidocorona
Thank you JimJoice, you are correct in that the twin power/data pigtails are shipped with the preamplifier, as such I am definitely breaking those in together with the pre. The ICs and power cord are Furutech Evolution II that I have used in the system since 1st quarter. Rather, as the pre has a lot of transformers (power management, input stages, output stages), I have been told that it may take particularly long to stabilize.

Pinkus, I thank you for your optimism. Of course, in the end, I hope that I will truly enjoy this device. I will try as much as I can to document what excites me, what does not, and most of all, why. If nothing else, I hope that this exercise will help yours truly to clarify the modalities of his own cheery audiophilic obsessions. G.
Yesterday I ask the MBL and Cary dealer to bring to my home the flagship SLP 05 pre-amplifier from Cary to compare with the Criterion. He was excited with the challenge, but after the session he said the Criterion has a more transparency sound and to beat the Jeff Roland only the MBL's top of the line, the USD 20k 6010 pre-amplifier.
Anyway, IMO, the Criterion will beat this device as well.
Thank you Brazcole, what other differences did you hear between SLP 05 and Criterion?
Brazcole,

couls you ask the MBL dealer if your 312 is strong enough to drive the 101E ?

these are truly amazing speakers, which I love too ;-)

saludos
At 193 hours of break in, here is one more update.

What is quite frankly surprising me, is the dynamic range that the Criterion can yield without overt signs of clipping, while maintaining sonic and most of all musical integrity.

part of the continuing break in, today I decided to go through all the Beethoven piano sonatas played by V. Ashkenazy on a multi CD Decca reissue box. I believe these to be old analog recordings from the 70s and 80s. I have not played this set very much in the past because I always found the sound somewhat hard and prone to unwelcome clipping on the louder passages. . . . not today.

What I found remarkable is the dynamic range that Criterion appeared to yield on the Waldstein without signs of apparent effort. I kept raising the volume and found mostly. . . more detail on the entire frequency band. I suspect I have reached SPL levels that normally would have chased me from the listening room, or at least would have caused severe ringing in the ears. . . yet, I am still perfectly comfortable after listening to the entire Waldstein sonata at concert volume level from a virtual distance of about 15 feet from the grand piano. While fff passages where awesome for their sheer impact, pp remained present, feathery, and never recessed into a murky distance. In fff, musical structure was still in evidence and had not started to coalesce into the typical blob of sonic overpressure. . . musical notes maintained their individual granularity even in complex arpeggios and chords. I never got the impression that I was getting into dangerous territory for either my ears or my speakers. A few passages here and there did have some hardness. I have no idea if this has to do with Ashkenazy getting overly enthusiastic and losing some wrist/elbow elasticity in his chording, or more likely, I was finally reaching the current limits of the criterion. I'll repeat the listening in several days and will know more.

On a different 'note'. . . you guys probably know that I am not exactly a great fan of Diana Krall. . . yet today her Temptations redbook album was absolutely delightful and totally enjoyable. The hot miking that so often bothers me was not in evidence. Rather, Krall's diction seemed superb and expressive, while her articulated pianistic commentary to the songs was crisp, harmonically satisfying and emotionally delicious. And yes, if anyone were asking, there is definitely more instrument individuality/separation/definition than on my still beloved Capri. The bass lines with Criterion are definitely easier to follow than on other pres I am familiar with.

If I were to judge the Criterion purely by the krall album, I may be tempted to conclude prematurely that the pre has reached sonic maturity, yet I really doubt that this is already the case.

G.