How an audio rack can enhance your amp/pre




Just thought I would share my recent experience with upgrading my sound star technologies rack to the new rhythm rack.

Every now and then, I have a visiting audiophile who really appreciates my system…and traditionally asks – “wow, what makes it sound so good?” My typical answer is it all makes a difference, even down the equipment rack, which can and certainly should be considered a component…but in many cases is overlooked…

Star Sound introduction

About 10 years ago, I was introduced to Star Sound Technologies Sistrum platforms and Audio Points. Audiopoints has always been known for its manufacture of well-designed and beautifully manufactured brass cones used under equipment and as an integral part of an audio stand. This ultimately led to the design of stands designed to transfer vibrations out of components and down to ground. What I didn’t know at the time was how good the Sistrum platforms ‘sounded’. So, I bit the bullet and tried several Sistrum Platforms - what intrigued me about the stands was the design of the Sistrum Platform which allowed a pre-determined pattern of energy, known as Coulomb Friction to develop and dissipate via a high-speed calculated conductive pathway to earth's ground. Which made sense…how do you deal with airborne energy dissipation? I know you could put cones to reduce vibrations from the ‘ground up’ so to speak, but how could you eliminate airborne vibration? We’ve all held our hand on our equipment when music is playing only to feel the equipment vibrate, so how do you deal with it? Draining it quickly to ground made sense, but at the end of the day, all I really wanted to know was…does it improve the sound?

To say I was shocked is an understatement - the Original Sistrum Platforms offered – smoother sound, better transients, dynamics and a lower noise floor. And, the cool part is that you could turn up the sound and the music would flow with greater ease…well worth the investment. Robert at Star Sound was extremely helpful in guiding me through which racks made the most sense for my system.

Rhythm Platforms

Which brings me to 2015…it had been a while since I last spoke with Robert curious as to what his engineering team was up to…which led me to check out the ‘new’ model of Sistrum Stands – the Sistrum Rhythm Platforms.

These new platforms / shelves were substantially heavier, with a nicer overall finish than the original stands, with more grooves allowing for substantially more options to place points in various places under your equipment to refine the sound even further. In addition, the shelves were engineered to deal with resonances in a more efficient manner…The brass cones at the bottom of the rack were substantially bigger in size - 3 inches and quite heavy. The brass cones under the equipment were attached with nicely crafted screws that could be hand tightened and no longer required a screw driver… a nice feature making it both easier to put together but also the amount of tightening could influence the sound. The brass and platform rods are modular, making it easier to put together and painted in a beautiful black finish – in combination with the brass I would say the improvement in the WAF factor is significant – the stands are really impressive to look at. As for structure, these things were a solid as could be – and heavy! Not going anywhere, even in an earthquake!

My system includes VAC equipment, preamp, amps, DAC and a transport. As well as power supplies. Most of which now rested on the new Rhythm Platform.

Listening Impressions:

My first impressions were clearly a lower noise floor with enhanced dynamics, while also being able to hear deeper into the soundstage, which now extended well outside of the speakers. Tempo was faster, due to better-defined, leading edges. The high end was ‘cleaner’, with more sheen and decay on symbols and hi hats. Brass had that right bite to it, without over doing it…Bass lines were tighter which led to better ‘rhythm’ … and best of all, I could crank up the volume and the dynamic range seemed to extend effortlessly, which was a nice surprise.

One thing I noticed, that was true of my initial experience with Sistrum Platforms, is that the newer Rhythm Platforms sounded progressively better after 3 days of ‘settling’ and reached full potential after about 1 week. So some form of break in is required.
Over the years, I’ve tried different racks and various cones under equipment, whether if be soft, hard, ceramic, rubber (or some variation of ‘absorbing material’ etc.) you name it. All of which ‘altered’ the sound, but nothing came close to the Sistrum Stands holistically; while the new Rhythm stands, just take it all to a higher level…
While I cannot expound eloquently on science of Coulomb’s Friction, I can tell you that whatever they are doing at Star Sound visa vie their racks, it works…and it’s not subtle. This is a very audible improvement in your listening experience. If you want your system to perform at its highest level, I would suggest that you maximize your investment in your equipment by letting it do what it does best and put it on a Sistrum rack that will allow it to perform at its best. And if you want the best, I would strongly recommend the Rhythm Platforms.
wisper
Schubert, I see. I went to the University of Virginia. Good public school (and cheap at the time) but in retrospect something small like MAC (or Carleton for science/math) would have been swell....
I was the first in my family to go to college and had to pay my own way. Fortunately, I got a scholarship to IIT (Ill. Inst. of Tech.). I started out in physics, changed to EE and then to ME and then tried to change to architecture only to be refused as I had real physics rather than that for architects, and finally into polical and social sciences. I also got involved in materials testing early on at Armour Research Foundation and early computers and building them.

I was convinced that science could resolve many questions in government and politics and decided to give up on staying in computers but to merely use them in analyses and to go to graduate school.

I then found in my career that studying humans is much more difficult than dealing with engineering issues. I studied voting behavior and found that most merely voted their party loyalty and often lied about whether they even voted or not. Later I discovered that states gather data that puts them into their most favorable perspective and lie about where they do poorly.

I also discovered that how wealthy a state is is the sole determinant with other factors controlled.

So why am I posting? My oldest grandson is now in college and my oldest granddaughter is a senior in high school. My son is her father who always knew precisely what he wanted to do and got his Phd as did his wife. I was asked often by my grandson and found I could not help.

Going to a small college has the benefit of approachability of professors and being able to ask questions in class, but usually those professor are not eminent in their fields. He choose a small liberal arts college with some strength in sciences. I hope he was right. My granddaughter has high scores and seems quite interested in Rice. She will need very high scores to get into that school and has been approached by IIT!
Geoff, roller bearings on top of an air bearing is exactly what Barry Diament recommends and uses himself, under his recording and playback gear. An air bearing can be as cheap as an under-inflated bike tire inner-tube under a piece of hardwood.

Tom, are you saying that if a component chassis is allowed to move laterally (as it is on a roller bearing), the time and phase characteristics of it's amplifying circuits are corrupted? Why---the electronic components are still in the same position on the circuit board, only the chassis has moved, a result of it's isolation from seismic vibration, surely a good thing? Why would you want a component rigidly coupled to terra firma, rather than isolated from it?
Hello TheKong,

In answer to your question on mechanical diodes (7-15-15)

A diode allows current to travel in only one direction. A mechanical diode allows gear rotation in one direction to be transmitted through the system.

Most believe “theoretically” that a mechanical diode related to vibration and resonance transfer processes moves energy in one direction.

Our opinions are that this theoretical process is ‘Not Possible’.

The geometry and shape of the Audio Points indeed provide a high-speed conductive pathway for energy to flow in one direction towards earth but heavily relies on the laws of physics, motion and the all important gravity to keep the majority of resonance flowing towards ground. ‘Ground’ is noted as the greater mass or energy sink available in the listening room such as floors, structural walls and ceiling grids.

Despite all the known sciences listed above, energy can still and does flow upward via conductive metals or other materials such as woods and acrylics, etc forming the conduit. Our simple analogy: if you remove the cap off a fire hydrant releasing the flow of water and take your fist - pushing it in against the flow is attainable though it may take a stronger person to accomplish this, it can be done. Energy movement related to an Audio Point™ can also move upward although the majority flows in downward trajectory towards mother earth based on the laws of science as we understand them.

There are some ‘isolationists’ who believe and teach that floor born energy travels up an equipment rack and poisons the equipment and yes we agree ‘in theory’. Even with geometry and science behind the Sistrum Platforms moving energy towards ground; minor amounts of energy can still travel in the opposite direction. The same holds true when using just Audio Points. Our opinion is this minimal trace of energy has no audible effect on the sonic performance.

Live-Vibe Technology™ is based on energy traveling everywhere, never ending and remaining in constant motion. Energy is a constant variable that cannot be destroyed. When related to musical reproduction, energy is generated from electro-mechanical and acoustic means, it establishes laminar flows and travels on structural surfaces (walls, floors and ceilings), it builds and propagates on all smooth surfaces, it is attracted to conductive metals, it dissipates as heat, it diffuses when two of the same frequencies collide, and the list goes on... “Energy caused from vibration is boundless”.

That said; defining a newfound approach to vibration management is extremely difficult at best. We choose to participate in an area of audio reproduction where little is known, little is understood, little is written and opinions and theories abound. We choose to participate in an unknown variable.

The fact that the High-End Audio Industry elects to name, classify and describe vibration management in one word - “isolation”, proves beyond any doubt the public is left on their own to form their own understanding. The term “Isolation” is only a small part, a categorical approach, a single methodology of which there are many in attempting to manage vibration. The term isolation easily relates and forms up an understanding especially to the novice. We know this to be true as we too began our careers under the same influences.

Floating in air, free from vibration, anti-vibration footers and racks, stop vibration, vibration should be destroyed, eliminate vibration, et ALL are results born from this inaccurate name provided us by our forefathers, mostly industry journalists and not people of science.

What would we hear or better yet, what would you be listening to without vibration?

Star Sound’s atypical approach to managing the negative effects caused from vibration by transferring resonant energy to ground via high-speed conductive pathways is but one part of the overall defining Live-Vibe Technology™.

Our opinion is that each unique piece of equipment has a preeminent operating efficiency.

We know every product is made differently. Materials, mass, design, build structure, etc - for all products are entirely different from one another. No two are the same. The only thing in common with all these variables is that every product has a set of frequencies where the utmost in performance (optimum operational efficiency) is attained while functioning in an ever changing vibrating environment.

Unfortunately we also realize that no matter what tests are performed in a laboratory, when the product is placed into a different environment these operational frequencies and results will also change.

How does one locate that state of optimum performance since every product is unique and every environment is different?

Our opinion is to let the product vibrate all to its own. While in a state of constant motion the parts and chassis will self adjust to optimum provided the properties of detrimental Coulomb friction which are formed from vibration are provided a high speed exit away from the source.

Let it vibrate! The equipment, room foundation, racking, walls, floors and ceilings are going to vibrate regardless. Listening to music is a dynamic experience where everything involved in reproduction or live performances is going to vibrate; even our own diaphragms located inside our heads - vibrate.

TheKong, thank you for another great question.

Robert Maicks
Star Sound Technologies, LLC
Wahoo wah! Go Cavs! When I went to UVa Scott stadium was the world's largest outdoor bar.