tvc vs avc

I had John's wonderful Tap linestage, which used S&B transformers as you mentioned, and then went on to another great linestage, the Flora, that used autotransformers in its volume control. So, to answer your question either device used and set up correctly offers great sonic performance and from a practical veiwpoint are the same.

I did a DIY project using S&B 102 mk3's. I wired it in as an TVC switchable to AVC at first. Completely accidental, it was supposed to be a HT bypass. Scratched a few hairs out that day. Anyhow, I didn't notice much difference, just a bit more bass and gain with AVC. I have other options in bass control but even if I hadn't, the benefit of balanced connection and conversion with TVC was more important to me. AVC's can be balanced too, but it takes 4 of them. With different brands of either, there is not a direct comparison between TVC and AVC. These are also so system dependant that one man's molehill could be another's mountain.

Interested in knowing if some of you have had the chance to compare since the last post. I tried the Bent Tap-x before with the AVC and liked it better than an S&B passive I tried, but it wasn't a Bent NOH or TAP. Would appreciate additonal comments on the the TVC AVC differences. Hi Teajay - yup, still trying new stuff.

bump, any new obeservations?