Musical Fidelity NU-VISTA M3 VS KW500


Hi Guys...........Please help............
Currently, I've sold all of my equipments, but kept my lovely Hales T-5 speaker. I want a fresh start with intergrated amp, instead of seperate amp & preamp.
So I'm pretty much need your input.....PLEASE!!!!!
With my Hales T-5 speaker:
1 - The different between Nu-Vista M3 and KW500. These are both high end from Musical Fidelity.
2 - How about a comparision the above with other manufacture such as Mark Levinson ML 338, Jeff Rowland Concentra Mark 1 or any other suggestion. I've tried Krell 400xi and not really like it (It's just my taste, no doubt Krell is a top audio production). It's too power, agressive, grainy and textures. I prefer something in full range detail, easy, relax listening, but yet quick snap punch base. I need at least above 100 watts for the speaker. My previous set up is full Classe system.
I'm really appreciated for your help.........

Joseph
xuandung
I use the M3 and am very happy with it. I chose it over the 500 on the basis of the fact that has fewer output devices and therefore a simpler circuit while having enough power for any conceivable use I might have. I also liked the gold front which the 500 does not have. I checked the forums before I bought and the opinion was split as to which was the better. Check Audioreviews and Audio Asylum and others for a wide assortment of views. I have seen few which didn't like both amps.
I had the NuVista Preamp an 300 amp a few years back and they had a great sound, so those are very nice. I heard the Pass integrated recently, I am not sure on price, and it was absolutely stellar, and my boss just got a Cary SLI80 and couldn't be happier, it's fantastic.

Good luck.
incredible speakers that love a bit of power. all that you're considering are fine.