Tube amp recommendation


My current amp is dying and therefore I am in the market for a new amp. I got my current amp back in my university daze (solid state, over 10 years old and cheap). Perhaps I should have upgraded years ago, but it served me well and I was happy enough with it (and spent the money on records instead).

I have always been impressed by the sound that tube amps generate and hence believe that my current amp is giving me the push to go finally into the tube world. I have read various items on this website (and a few others) and have a bit of confusion (and hence some questions).

Now pieces of information about me...
1) I like to listen to large assortment of music (old skool reggae, bad electronic music, the occasional rock record, various jazz items, sometimes even hiphop). Often I listen to stuff in what seems like an random order.
2) I am rather lazy on my days off (when I listen to music most of the time).

With these two points I mean I don't really want to change a set of tubes because my music selection is a sometimes bit schizophrenic. I don't want to manually adjust bias settings every Saturday morning (occasionally fair enough).

Therefore, can anyone recommend any tube amps that are in the entry - mid level for me?
dennyc
you neglected to tell us two "biggies" your speakers and how much you want to spend.
Check out the CARY SLA-70 now for sale here on the 'Gon. It's self biasing, reliable, and CLASS A. Tubes last and are cheap to replace.
Rogue M-150 about $2,000 used. 150 watts ultralinear and 100 watts triode easy to switch on the fly. Easy to bias and holds bias well. Good control of woofers and American made. Good luck
FWIW if the amp is good, its good with rock, hip hop, electronic, classical- whatever.

I might respectfully disagree with you here, Ralph. I think we've discussed this; the exception I can think of is with low-powered SET amps which excel at certain specific qualities that are best enjoyed with more sparse and simple musical arrangements. Though they can certainly also sound "good" with rock, hip-hop, electronic, etc., my experience has been that denser arrangements are better served by different topologies delivering more current. I guess then your statement might imply that those SET amps are not "good" amps, which what I'd understand you are opining here (those amps which are not versatile enough to handle any type of music are not "good" amps). Correct me if I'm wrong. I understand that there are issues of distortion that also come hand-in-hand with many SET designs, particularly 2nd order harmonic distortions. These haven't seemed to bother me, or their bother is offset by the qualities I'm enjoying, I suppose.

From your paper:

In the world of speakers, efficiency of the speaker has been an issue that the Voltage camp has had to address, as the older Power Paradigm specification of 1 watt/1 meter was a 'chink in the armour'. The new Voltage Paradigm specification, Senstivity, illustrates the point: 2.83V/ 1 meter is the spec, resulting in a certain sound pressure level, expressed in db, just like the Efficiency spec. 2.83 Volts into an 8 ohm load is 1 watt. 2.83 Volts into 4 ohms is 2 watts. Thus, a speaker can have a senstivity rating that looks the same as the efficiency rating, but the speaker can be several decibels less efficient if the impedance is lower. This is an easy way to cover up how much power it really takes to drive a speaker, and also creates an expression that moves the efficiency issue into the Voltage Paradigm nomenclature. It would also seem to create a 'buyer be ware' situation: you have to know how to interpret the numbers to get to the truth of the matter.

From another thread, I mentioned that I'm using 9 watt SET amps pushing speakers in nearfield that are 92db at a flat 10ohms. The only times I've experience audible distortions has been in the low end, when bass gets very low and intense. I'd always assumed that it was the amps inability to move the larger bass drivers fast enough, but you seem to be implying something different here (or are you)? Am I actually pushing the speakers to distortion in other parts of the range and just not hearing it as much as in the bass? Oh, and is "Voltage Camp" like "Band Camp"?

Finally, a quick note to the original poster who has not chimed in with more specs. Another detail you did not mention is whether or not you already had a preamp and what that component was, or whether you were in search of an integrated tube amp. As others have indicated your budget and speakers might be good things to list. "Entry to mid-level" might mean different things to different people. I'd guess from re-reading your post that you are probably looking for an integrated tube amp. No idea of your budget though. I'd echo the recommendation of Quicksilver, but Mike's stuff is all power amps (require a preamp) - certainly huge bang-for-buck there. Ralph's amps are excellent as well, but I wouldn't put them into an entry to mid-level category (again, that is subjective according to your own budget). There are a whole bunch of good integrated tube amps coming from China if you care to go that direction. I'm more for supporting local myself, but offerings are not as plentiful.
Ralph,

Some irony in your "If an amp is good..." quotation.I once owned an S-30 (very early production) that was terrific with Merlin VSMs...so long as there was no deep bass content. With my Verity P/E, the amp sounded very good ONLY on a limited variety of program material.

While your point is taken, the fundamentally different power requirements between -for example- acapella voical music and the synthesized deep bass in some dance music may make an amp (speaker combo) that's great with the former unsuitable for the latter. IME, there are many amp/speaker combos that have proven much better suited to small scale music.

In this sense, at least, I'd say your comment is an overstatement.

Marty