SET vs ICE vs GAINCLONE vs HYBRID vs other?


I'm looking for amp recommendations. Here's my situation:
I just gave up a nice JAS Array 2.1 int amp using 805's and 300B's. That amp was rated at 45W. I traded it in toward a Wyred 4 Sound ST-500. This amp is very nice.
I have no real complaints although I do notice the slight loss of intimacy and "wetness of sound" compared to the JAS and I feel the Wyred's top end to be slightly soft overall. Still, I'm quite satisfied with the sound and thrilled at not having the expense of tube replacement nor the insane amound of heat 805's put out.

The rest of my system unfolds like this: I run a Consonance Droplet directly into the amp (balanced) using Sunny Cables D1000X. The CDP and an a PS Audio P-600
get connected with Sunny Cables P600 power cords and the amp gets a 6Sons Audio Windigo. I have Porter Ports in the conditioner and the wall outlet. Speakers are custom-
jobbies similar to Legacy Focus using Eton drivers and I just had fellow Audiogonner M VanSloten upgrade the crossovers (thanks to another thread-good call!). I run Anti-cables directly into the speakers and connect them to the crossovers without binding posts. The soundstage is huge but very well focused and resolution is excellent.
Tone is colorful but not quite as rich as with the JAS.

So, my question to you ever-so-wise audio sages is how do I get the best of both amps without adding a preamp and not spending much more money than I can generate selling the Wyred ST-500? I absolutely need to maintain a high level of detail AND I must get excellent (almost) pinpoint imaging. I would also appreciate an extended top end but not too bright. My speakers are quite efficient. The 45W JAS almost was enough (efficiency in the mid 90db/1w).

I was considering gainclones such as the Patek or Audio Zone AMP1 or hybrids such as Pathos' Classic One MK II/III
or Valve Audio's Predator. I would greatly appreciate comments on the above listed amps especially if you can compare them to the Wyred amps. Thanks so much!
lcherepkai
Guido, What difference does the type of power supply have in the Class d amps. Some appear to have a bank of caps and some have regular torradial types. Also how does this affect break in time?
I see one company(Spectron) burns in their amps.
Thanks,
Don
I've had the Wyred amp for most of this year and ran it several hours a day the first few weeks to burn it in. I've also ran it extensively burning in a pair of interconnects followed by the new crossovers so it has almost certainly been burned in. Thanks--
Lcherepkai, switch mode amps like Rowlands, Belcanto, and probably W4S seem to take an inordinate amount of time to break in. I'd make sure they have about 1200 hours of playing time before doing critical listening. One more interesting thing about ICEpower amps, is that they like to be left powered up between listening sessions to sound their best. If you turn off switch mode amps for a few hours, it might take them more than a day to revert back to top performance. Good news is that they tend to draw extremely little power when idling. Your W4S probably draw 9 to 10W each on idle. I turn off my Rowland 312 only when a thunderstorm is approaching, or I have to leave home for trip. G.
Don, a number of manufacturers are using switch mode power supplies in their class D amps because they are small, very fast, extremely energy efficient, and when properly executed yield wonderful musical results. Others are staying with traditional toroidal or linear power supplies that are a lot bulkier. Like with everything else, the difference is not so much in the underlying type of technology being used, but in how it is being implemented. A switch mode power supply is small and very agile, but it can also sound a little brittle when not done right. There are low cost switch mode power supplies for consumer level products. . . and there also very advanced and costly switch mode power supplies that are fast and quiet enough for aerospace and defense industry applications, that are used by some audio manufacturers in some reference products.

In the end, use your ears. . . if the amp sounds right to you, whatever the designer did with the power supply design must have worked. . . if it does not sound right, no matter the power supply technology used, the amp will remain unsatisfactory to you.

On the subject of break in, some manufacturers do a little burn in of their products before shipping. This is usually done as a final quality check. . . essentially to give the amp a chance to prove that it can perform its job. But the real break in process usually last hundreds of hours, and a manufacturer does not have the resources to lock its inventory for 6 to 8 weeks to do a complete break in before shipping. So, when you get an amp, and a switch mode amp like Spectron, be very patient and let it blossom. My suggestion is about 1200 hours to be safe, but some amps do take half as much. G.