Are ML CLS speakers a match with SS BAT amps?

I appreciate all the comments. To Mofimadness: how would you compare the ESL to the Pass Labs on the CLS? To Nsarch: I tried a pair of 200W ARC monoblocks on my CLS and found the bass to be ill-defined. Of course, the amps sounded wonderful in the mid-range and treble. How would you describe the bass on a Mac tube amp compared to a powerful SS amp such as your Mark Levinson 23.5?

I have heard that the BAT amp is very tube like in sound for a SS amp. The Pass Labs seem to be very popular with CLS owners. Of course, it is all about the synergy. I am trying to get a feeling from CLS owners about which amps have a "wow" factor when matched up with the CLS. It is a hassle to audition amps and I want to make a short list. I am the original owner of my CLS and currently power them with a Mark Levinson ML3, which I love. My question is: After 20 years is there a better amp out there for my CLS? Nsgarch, I do like bass. For years I owned a pair of Entecs, but they couldn't handle double duty when I added HT. So, I sold the Entecs and got a pair of Descent i(s). An awesome combination. The bass is POWERFUL and defined. Thanks for the feedback.

Dchazen, "bass" is something a CLS just won't do no matter what amp you use, tube, SS, ML, ARC, Pass, BAT, Mac. Its bass response starts to fall off at around 60 - 70Hz and is down by half at 40Hz and completely gone by 30Hz. So when you say "I tried a pair of 200W ARC monoblocks on my CLS and found the bass to be ill-defined." I'm thinking, "compared to what?" Unless you listen to a lot of solo guitar, small jazz combos, or string quartets, you won't get all the bass that's on the recording. That said, a very small boost starting at 35Hz is all that's necessary to turn it into a full range speaker; and the ML Depth is just the ticket!

The "quality" of the bass the CLS produces is another matter. You can't imagine how well a CLS can do what bass it does do (cleaner, not louder), until you get it up off the floor on stands -- I received a directive from ML regarding just that early on; stands also improve the soundstage by eliminating the 'floor reflection' off the bottom of the panel.

The ML 23.5 is probably, (along with the ML 20.6,) the closest anyone has come to the sound of a thermionic valve using solid state switching; though I must admit, I haven't heard the latest darTZeel or Boulder or Lamm ;-) I used my 23.5 for driving Wilson Puppies as subs in 1992 because they were the only low frequency speakers that had transient response fast enough to match an electrostat (did you read my system page?). I did compare it directly with the MC275 and the tube amp was superior in midrange detail, separation of instruments, air/hall ambience. Doing some tube rolling brought back the high frequency extension of a SS amp but without any glare or harshness.

For bass boost, you only need one Depth (or Descent, although I prefer the Depth for its transient quickness) It should be placed smack between the panels and set to 90 degree phase angle (the phase that exists halfway between the front and back of the panels ;-) and crossed over (rolled off) starting at 35Hz. You won't need a lot of volume - just enough so you notice if you suddenly turn the sub off. Do not low-pass the CLS! Run it full range and just let it naturally run out of gas on the low end ;-)

Thanks Nsgarch. The CLS are up on stands and run at full range. I prefer two subs for stereo. The ARC bass was ill-defined compared to my ML3. Did you trade of some low end definition on your CLS when you switched from the ML 23.5 to the MC275?

Dchazen, the CLS should be able to provide excellent bass down to its design limits as I mentioned - and that's regardless of amp type as long as the amp is a 100W+ toobie (with a damping factor greater than 14) or a 150W+ SS. And it's good that you have the panels off the floor.

Now, there may be other factors compromising their bass performance:

1. If you ARE using a tube amp, you want speaker cables no longer than 2.5 meters (~ 8ft) to get the most out of a tube amp's limited damping. The shorter the better.
2. Make sure you are using a LOW CAPACITANCE speaker cable. This is essential for good stat performance, expecially bass. This means, for instance, NO Cardas speaker cables, which all have capacitance over 400 picofarads per foot. Electrostats require speaker cables with less than 20 picofarads per foot. You can test my advice by going to Home Depot and buying four lengths of 12AWG insulated solid copper wire and hooking your speakers up with it ;-)
3. Another very likely culprit are your TWO subwoofers, which, depending on where they are placed, and their phase, level, and crossover point settings, may actually be cancelling the CLS's output at certain low frequencies. So let me give you my little prepared speech on subwoofers:
a. The human brain cannot locate the source of frequencies below 100 Hz. A true "subwoofer" should be operating below 100Hz, and with CLS's. below 40Hz, so having TWO subs (operating below 100Hz) will NOT contribute to "stereo". And the main speakers, unless they are monitors on stands, should certainly go down to 60Hz or less before thay start rolling off - and that's where your "stereo bass" should be coming from.
b. Subwoofer placement is critical for proper integration with the main speakers; and placing two subs is much, much harder than placing one - so why bother? (unless you're living in a cathedral and need more bass output;-) And if you ARE living in a cathedral, you can put them at the back of the cathedral.
c. And it's damn near impossible to properly locate two subs if your main speakers are panels! This is because, unlike conventional loudspeakers, panels have two out-of-phase radiation patterns. The the sound wave from the front of the panel is 180 degrees OUT OF PHASE with the sound wave coming from the rear (and yes, the front and back waves cancel each other at the edges of the panels.) That is why with panel speakers, the best place for a sub is smack in between (and right even with) the panels, AND set at 90 degree phase angle, which splits the difference and matches the the phase of the two mains at that location. The ML Depth or Descent, with its omnidirectional radiation pattern (due to the three drivers facing in three directions) are ideal for such placement.

This may all sound counter-intuitive to you, but I beg you indulge an old man, who studied acoustics at MIT ;-)

Thanks.
.

Thanks Nsgarch. However, I have to disagree because I know what I heard from my CLS. The amp does make a difference on the bass. The SS ML3 @ 200W per channel handles the bass nicely. The late model tube ARC 200W mono amps, not as nicely. They are both highly rated amps in their own dominions. Maybe it was the particular ARC amp I used, but I have repeatedly read comments in forums that you generally give up something in bass tightness, definition and impact when a tube amp is used as compared to a SS amp. How did your CLS bass change, if at all, when you used the MC275 as compared to the ML23.5?