Lamm ML2, VLadimirs best effort to date?


Rumour has it VLadimirs early ML2 monos are his best design effort to date over the ML2.1
Near the time of the ML2s release onto the market, VLad commented ,nothing else could possibly be done to improve upon my amplifier design.

The intention of my post here is not wanting to start a fire storm based on information that I came across including that of an owner of the ML2.

Simply put I'm going down a completely new path for a system based around s.e.t. amplifiers, Lamm is my choice.

My question, any other owners here of the Lamm ML2 have direct comparison experience between the ML2 and ML2.1?
stiltskin
Steve I'm sure Vlads statement ML3 is everything owners say it is and more, I'm happy for you.
I do not think that the ML2.1 was meant to be a sonic upgrade. I understood it to be a change easier for voltage usage, meaning 110 / 220 and a few parts differences, i.e., binding posts.

I have heard both and they were very similar.

I may be wrong.
binding posts do make a big diff IME, and the superior electric posts he used in the ML2s are regarded as the best avail (very little actual metal on them---ala eichmann bullet plugs).

i'd get the 2.1s and swap the superior posts in. you will notice an improvement