2. amps-preamps
  3. 1257785759

New to SET - Help in all areas

I have made the decision to go from high power/high current to a SET system. Like many people here, I have a tendancy to change out components (and now a system concept as a whole). I am coming from Krell FPB 300C going into Wilson Watt/Puppy's with a tubed Calypso preamp. I love this set-up, but alas it is going, going, gone in a move to SET.

I just don't know these components as well, but do understand that system/component matching is even that much more important. I read in various threads that I gain a lot in the midrange and loose in the bass and high frequencies. I also have read (multiple times) that such set-ups do not perform as well with rock, complex, etc. . . music.

Since I am starting from scratch, I am hoping to end up with a system that reduces the impact of loosing out on the complex and rock music (as much as possible) while at the same time still achieving good high freq. performance. I have a REL sub that I can use to support the bottom octaves (should I deem it necessary).

I don't want to give up a good sound stage, with some decent depth, width, height and focus.

What amp and speaker combos can you (based on personal experience and trial and error) recommend most for my goals? I am keen on the Zu Druids, based on a lot of what I have read about them, but am open to other suggestions if they are not limiting in my goals.

I am also open to the different type of SET amps (300B, 45, 845, 2A3, etc. . . ). Finally, if anybody in the midwest has a SET system and wouldn't mind me stopping in, I would greatly appreciate it. I am in Kalamazoo, Michigan.

Thanks so much in advance for your advice and recommendations. I know I will get replies as to everybody is different (I know), what's your budget (varies, but it seems like I can get a good system for a couple of thousand, and even less). Room? Not the best, it is about 12 X 14 or something like that. No I don't listen at super high levels. I am hesitant to buy something that I then need to have heavily modified. Yes, I would prefer to buy used. I want to avoid buying components that have known reliability issues. I have owned tubes before (amps and preamps). I AM VERY OPEN (PREFERED) TO AN INTEGRATED AMP!
ckoffend
pauly
1,012 posts
 
Single driver, back or front loaded horn or transmission line is normally the best match for a SET amp. Driver such as lowther and fostex with high(ish) efficiency is needed, especially if young or for 300B or 2A3s. The choice of speaker will make or break your SET experience.

Get rid of the sub – you don't want to contaminate the sound.

Regards
Paul
atmasphere's avatar
atmasphere
11,662 posts
 
Dehavilland makes some of the best SETs out there IMO and they go well with the ZU loudspeakers.
jeffb28451
129 posts
 
Have Wavelength 45 Customs, 2 throbbing watts into Beauhorns with Lowther dx-4s. Have no idea what Paully means about contamintating sound. I use a TacT to intregrate stereo subs and tame the upper mid rise of the Lowthers.

Who, Little Feat, Arrowsmith, Red Hot chili Peppers, even Ted Nugent (my secret shame) can tear down the house, but Laura Hunt on 45 RPM sounds great and chamber music does just fine. "Firebird Suite" is like a physical contest and reminds me of my days playing principal trumpet in front of the trombone section/sheer horsepower without strain.

30 years in and dozens of speakers, thousands of Watts, ss and tube, etc. under the bridge and this is one of my three best systems and by far the simplest.

Zu's are okay, but you may not be able to go 45 or 2a3's, may have to stick to 300b. Be careful, as the speaker is the ticket.

BTW, Beauhorns STINK without careful placment and stereo subs, IMHO.

Jeff
elevick
2,636 posts
 
If you go with Coincident speakers, you won't lose anything, bass or highs. Mine can make 7 watts sing or scream painfully.
More to discover