Tubes vs. solid state.


I just switched back to my ss equipment and can't see how I listened to ss for so many years and thought that I had a good system, maybe the equipment needs to be left on for some time.
But regardless of that, the difference is startling. I know that my tube equipment is not the same degree of excellence as my ss, but now ss sounds lean, thin lifeless. Have my listening priorities changed? One thing I noticed; my listening perception adapts to the sound present in the room. As I write this the sound is improving incremently.
Anyone share the same experience??
I will post as I will continue to listen and notice differences.
Ss is simaudio p-5 w-5, tubes are Cj premier 4 amp and audio experience a2se preamp.
Are there ss preamps that will satisfy or am I smitten by bubes I mean tubes.
pedrillo
Atmasphere, do zero feedback solid state designs share the same benefits as zero feedback tube amps ?

Thanks
Oh shucks, I must really be tin-eared, because I have never detected any correlation between 0-feedback and the sound I like, in any amps I heard, tubed and SS alike.
Guido,

I have. And although my sample is limited, I have found a very strong correlation between zero feedback designs and my long term satisfaction with the equipment.

Non-zero feedback designs that I have dealt with and discarded because of aural issues:

1. Rowland capri
2. Rowland Synergy 2i
3. CJ MV-60SE
4. Linn Klimax
5. Nagra PLL

Besides the CJ above, which I lived with for a year, I got rid of the other equipment within a matter of months, if not weeks.

Equipment, I have had a long term relationship with:

1. CJ Premier 14 (3-4 years)
2. Nagra VPA (bought it and never got rid of)
3. Ayre A7 integrated
4. Ayre KX-R
5. Dartzeel nhb-108

I did not start out with any biases towards non-zero feedback designs ... in fact it was the other way around. I would always (and still do) peruse the distortion measurements of equipment in Sterophile, Soundstage, and I had a strong bias against zero feedback designs, as they showed up poorly in the measurements department.

My ears simply lead me to the equipment that I now have.

Of course it is also possible that I am highly suggestible, and I am the one with the tin-ear.
Pinkus, the only issue with transistors is that without feedback, they will make more distortion than tubes will. However, if the design is competent, the higher orders will not manifest nearly so much as they will if feedback is applied. Its my opinion that in time we (as designers) will sort out what must be done to make them work properly.

One of the best amplifiers I have heard is transistor, made by Ridley Audio. It was zero feedback and class A and fully differential. It employed a heater to heat the output devices to a fairly high temperature (and then regulated the heat) and made as much heat as any tube amp of the same power. The amp made 100 watts and cost about $100,000 for a pair (they could drive a 1 ohm load); a bit pricey for my blood but proof that the extra distortions of transistors can be tamed if handled right.

For the time being as I mentioned earlier, it is a lot easier to use tubes to keep the distortion down. It might be cheaper too. If one looks at the whole amp/speaker thing from the point of view of obeying human perceptual rules, the issue of higher output impedance of zero feedback amps becomes moot- that is 'what is' so you deal with it in the design.
Pinkus, Our tin ears must be forged from different pewter alloys. . . I have never liked KX-R, but as you know have used lovingly a Capri for a year and a half.

BTW, I was not aware that feedback or lack there-of even applied to pre designs.

G.