Myles, the mbl has an impedance peak of about 8-9 ohms in the midrange driver. The designer is expecting the amp to reduce power by 3 db through this range. An amplifier with feedback will do it, one without will not. A good number of tube amps tend to sound shrill on this speaker even though otherwise they have plenty of power. So Michael was probably using an amp with a lot of feedback.
The problem here is that IMO, amps with feedback sound somewhat shrill out of the box, IOW its my opinion that a speaker that requires this will never sound like real music.
Kirkus, I know about the TIM articles but obviously amps designed to overcome that 'issue' were horrendous.
IMO the issue with feedback boils down to open loop propagation delay in the amplifier- IOW its a timing issue. The feedback signal simply does not arrive back at the input in time to make the correction. With a steady-state signal, the amp locks in pretty well over a few iterations, but with a constantly-changing waveform the amp will be chaotic. This is an interesting subject and I agree- a topic for another thread.
The problem here is that IMO, amps with feedback sound somewhat shrill out of the box, IOW its my opinion that a speaker that requires this will never sound like real music.
Kirkus, I know about the TIM articles but obviously amps designed to overcome that 'issue' were horrendous.
IMO the issue with feedback boils down to open loop propagation delay in the amplifier- IOW its a timing issue. The feedback signal simply does not arrive back at the input in time to make the correction. With a steady-state signal, the amp locks in pretty well over a few iterations, but with a constantly-changing waveform the amp will be chaotic. This is an interesting subject and I agree- a topic for another thread.