Simaudio I7 vs P5.3/W5.3


Hi has any one tried the i7 against the P5.3/W5.3 separates. I think the i7 is rated 150W as is the W5.3.

Also has anyone tried the new W5.3 against the old W5 (pre 2007 model), as I can get the old one quite a bit cheaper ex-demo.

Thanks
acdvd
I too will mention the calypso but will go further and say that my w-5 never sounded this good. If it was me I would get the w-5 and a calypso preamp it's that good, I think I am done searching for a very long time. I also would like to add if you have an analog rig go for the JLTI phono stage it synergizes with the calypso very well too.
Where I live the market is very limited, so no niche products like Calypso here!!

Interestingly Simaudio emailed me this about the W5 and W5.3

"P-5 and W-5 was the top of the line, a few years ago.
If we can compare P-5 and P-5.3 (sonically speaking) we cannot compare W-5 and W-5.3. The W-3 will be more as the W-5.3. The W-5 is a fully dual mono power amplifier; both part are separate, from the power supply -you can see on my picture 2 huge transformers- to the output. The W-5.3 is a stereo power amplifier with the power supply sheared by both channel."

as well as "I never said P-5 is better than P-5.3 or W-5 is better than W-5.3, but the power supply inside the W-5 is more sophisticated."

Although I found a forum message posted by a Simaudio person a few years ago saying this:
"With the exception of the W-5/10 (and the W-5 LE), none of the past Classic Series models was ever dual-mono in terms of power supply design. Assuming you are speaking of the W-5 (which was our most popular amplifier at the time), you do not know enough about the new W5.3 to make such a statement as "cheaper build". Furthermore, the W5.3 is considerably less expensive, therefore negating what you said that we "did not drop the price". In addition, the W5.3 is less expensive because the power has been reduced to 150Wrms/ch. With one very large transformer containing separate windings for each channel, it actually has the ability to operate more efficiently into difficult loads than the W-5 when amplifying music, because each channel can draw more than its share of current when needed - unlike the W-5 which could not. Finally, the W5.3 has all of the W-5 LE's circuit updates and tweaks, making it sound more refined and musical than the W-5. At a price of $5300 (compared to $6900 and $7800 for the old W-5 and the W-5 LE respectively), the W5.3 is, in our opinion, the better deal. "
They strongly recommend I try the 600i before going down the pre/power path...anyone had a listen yet?