Tbg is right about the current tube selection in designs. Be it whomever... amp makers gotta choose which ones are avialable now and in good supply.
otherwise they'd say which NOS ones to use and not supply tubes with their amps, right? Leaving it up to us to feret out them still strong as new, non noisey, non fonic NOS tubes to fill it out with.
But that dog just won't hunt. At all.
Again, the true key in tube substitution is the vendor and the testing equipment they have and the measures with which they test them... and how well they support waht they sell.
I'll not mention names here either in terms of those who don't support well what they sell... but that part is integral IMHO. Knowing who is as good as knowing which.
I found not much difference from the Tele to the RCA. Some for sure, but not lots. RCAs have more lower end definition and weight IMO. tele top ends are super but that's about it IMO. both their mids were similar.
otherwise they'd say which NOS ones to use and not supply tubes with their amps, right? Leaving it up to us to feret out them still strong as new, non noisey, non fonic NOS tubes to fill it out with.
But that dog just won't hunt. At all.
Again, the true key in tube substitution is the vendor and the testing equipment they have and the measures with which they test them... and how well they support waht they sell.
I'll not mention names here either in terms of those who don't support well what they sell... but that part is integral IMHO. Knowing who is as good as knowing which.
I found not much difference from the Tele to the RCA. Some for sure, but not lots. RCAs have more lower end definition and weight IMO. tele top ends are super but that's about it IMO. both their mids were similar.